Editorial
Consent issues in cardiology
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The era of "benign paternalism" is over. Clinicians are now required to ensure the active participation of individual patients in decisions relating to their treatment, and their education regarding risks and benefits of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Except in those rare cases where disclosure of risk is likely to cause serious harm, clinicians must now attempt to ensure that patients are fully informed.
The obtaining of appropriately informed and well documented consent
helps the process of developing trust between patient and clinician. Of
developing importance is the defensive role played by the same process,
when distressed or litigious patients suffer significant complications;
this is especially so where outcomes involve serious long term
consequences. In these cases, defective or inadequately documented
consent procedures may provide relatively straightforward routes to
successful claims. To succeed in law, claimants may have to do no more
than demonstrate, on a balance of probability, that they
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Doyal, L
(2002). Good clinical practice and informed consent are inseparable. Heart
87: 103-105
[Abstract] [Full Text] -
KURBAAN, A. S, SMITH, S., MILLS, P. G
(2001). Consent in cardiac practice. Heart
86: 593-594
[Full Text]
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
