Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2003;89:1125-1126; doi:10.1136/heart.89.10.1125
Copyright © 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2003;89:1125-1126
© 2003 by BMJ Publishing Group & British Cardiac Society

EDITORIAL

The CARDia trial protocol

D Smith

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr David Smith, Department of Cardiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, UK;
dagobert@eurobell.co.uk


The question of which revascularisation strategy is best in diabetics is a very important one, and it demands a robust answer

Keywords: angioplasty; stent; diabetes; restenosis

Abbreviations: ARTS, arterial revascularisation therapy study; BARI, bypass angioplasty revascularisation investigation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CARDia, coronary artery revascularisation in diabetes; EAST, Emory angioplasty versus surgery trial; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RITA, randomised intervention treatment of angina; SoS, stent or surgery

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

An earlier edition of the web based version of Heart (May 2003) saw the electronic publication of the protocol of the CARDia (coronary artery revascularisation in diabetes) trial. The CARDia trial is a multi-centre, "prospective, randomised comparison of optimal coronary angioplasty—with use of stenting and abciximab recommended—versus up to date coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus suitable for either intervention". It will recruit 600 patients through 20 centres over a two year period. Patients suitable for either procedure will be randomised to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The PCI group will be further randomised to receive bare stents or rapamycin eluting stents.

The publication of a trial protocol is a new departure for Heart but follows precedents in other journals when important trials are planned or underway. It might at first sight seem odd to publish protocols of trials in peer review . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kereiakes, D. J., Teirstein, P. S., Sarembock, I. J., Holmes, D. R. Jr, Krucoff, M. W., O'Neill, W. W., Waksman, R., Williams, D. O., Popma, J. J., Buchbinder, M., Mehran, R., Meredith, I. T., Moses, J. W., Stone, G. W. (2007). The Truth and Consequences of the COURAGE Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 1598-1603 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • King, S. B. III (2007). Five-Year Follow-Up of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS-II): Prologue to COURAGE. Circulation 115: 1064-1066 [Full Text]  
  • de Araujo Goncalves, P, Seabra-Gomes, R, Teles, R, Almeida, M, Aguiar, C, Raposo, L, Ferreira, J, Pereira Machado, F (2006). Complementary effects of sirolimus-eluting stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: one-year follow up of a single-centre registry.. Heart 92: 1155-1156 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.