Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2004;90:123-125; doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.020800
Copyright © 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society
Heart 2004;90:123-125
© 2004 by BMJ Publishing Group & British Cardiac Society

EDITORIAL

Optimal therapeutic strategies in the setting of post-infarct no reflow: the need for a pathogenetic classification

L Galiuto

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Leonarda Galiuto
MD, PhD, Institute of Cardiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00136 Rome, Italy; lgaliuto@rm.unicatt.it


Although no reflow is clearly associated with a poor prognosis, little guidance is available on the treatment of this phenomenon. The ideal therapeutic approach comprises drugs with multiple actions on the microvascular damage produced by ischaemia/reperfusion, as well as knowledge of the time course of events in order to optimise the timing of administration

Keywords: microvascular dysfunction; no reflow

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Extensively studied both in the experimental and clinical setting, the no reflow phenomenon is clearly associated with unfavourable clinical outcome and prognosis.1 Despite the large body of evidence on the efficacy of different possible therapeutic approaches, clear guidelines on the treatment of no reflow have not been given; thus, the phenomenon is not consistently and uniformly treated in clinical practice. A possible reason for this apparent paradox may reside in the confusion generated by the multifactorial pathogenesis of no reflow, with consequent difficulty in the design of an adequate therapeutic strategy. Thus, there is a need for a pathogenetic classification of the phenomenon as an important premise for targeted forms of treatment.

STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL NO REFLOW: A NOVEL PATHOGENETIC CLASSIFICATION

By definition, no reflow is the inability to reperfuse a myocardial region after prolonged ischaemia, despite reopening of the infarct related artery. Based on morphological and functional studies,23 the phenomenon may be classified into two different forms: structural . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Camici, P. G., Crea, F. (2007). Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction. NEJM 356: 830-840 [Full Text]  
  • Yang, Y.-J., Zhao, J.-L., You, S.-J., Wu, Y.-J., Jing, Z.-C., Gao, R.-L., Chen, Z.-J. (2007). Post-infarction treatment with simvastatin reduces myocardial no-reflow by opening of the KATP channel. Eur J Heart Fail 9: 30-36 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.