Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2007;93:1167-1169; doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.113878
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

EDITORIALS

Has thrombolysis lost its mojo?

James M Brophy

Correspondence to:
Dr J M Brophy, Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology and Cardiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, R4.12, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1; james.brophy@mcgill.ca


See article on page 1244

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; epidemiology; primary angioplasty; thrombolysis

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

No man can be a pure specialist without being in the strict sense an idiot George Bernard Shaw

In this issue, Asseburg and colleagues report a systematic review of 22 randomised trials to assess the effectiveness of primary angioplasty compared with thrombolysis and its relationship to time delays (see article on page 1244).1 They conclude that angioplasty is superior provided that the additional time delay is less than 90 minutes. Although both a systematic review2 examining essentially the same studies and a meta-regression3 showing the importance of the additional time delays have been previously published, Asseburg’s work makes several unique contributions. First, it provides an updated review using full publications rather than abstracts, includes an additional study and makes several data corrections. Second, the authors have extended the analysis from 1 to 6 months’ follow-up. Finally, the authors have performed a more rigorous and comprehensive analysis using Bayesian . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Is primary angioplasty cost effective in the UK? Results of a comprehensive decision analysis
Yolanda Bravo Vergel, Stephen Palmer, Christian Asseburg, Elisabeth Fenwick, Mark de Belder, Keith Abrams, and Mark Sculpher
Heart 2007 93: 1238-1243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Edmond, J J, Juergens, C P, French, J K (2009). The pharmaco-invasive approach to STEMI: when should fibrinolytic-treated patients go to the "cath lab"?. Postgrad. Med. J. 85: 331-334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Edmond, J J, Juergens, C P, French, J K (2009). The pharmaco-invasive approach to STEMI: when should fibrinolytic-treated patients go to the "cath lab"?. Heart 95: 358-361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.