Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2007;93:632-638; doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.074849
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

EDUCATION IN HEART

Coronary disease

RESCUE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: DOES THE CONCEPT MAKE SENSE?

Eric Eeckhout

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Eric Eeckhout
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland; eric.eeckhout@chuv.ch

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is defined as mechanical reperfusion for failed fibrinolysis. The efficacy of rescue PCI has always been debated. Despite a high level of immediate technical success and the positive impact on ventricular function, conflicting data on mortality have been reported. Several historical explanations may be given. Initially, rescue PCI was associated with a high reocclusion rate and increased mortality if unsuccessful. Contrary to fibrinolysis, the rare randomised trials on rescue PCI are characterised by small study populations and major differences in methodology. In particular, there is no consensus on timing and defining failed fibrinolysis. During the last few years two randomised trials, both from the UK, have been published, providing new insights into this old problem. It is now apparent that rescue PCI is superior to conservative management or pharmacotherapy. Efforts should be made to implement this treatment . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

WEB TOP 10
Heart 2007 93: 791. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

MANAGEMENT OF END STAGE HEART FAILURE
Erik B Friedrich and Michael Böhm
Heart 2007 93: 626-631. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ndrepepa, G., Schomig, A., Kastrati, A. (2009). The Only Better Alternative to Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 127-129 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
BMJ Learning
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.