Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2007;93:775-777; doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.109512
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

FEATURED EDITORIAL

Will generic hypertension guidelines reduce the proliferation of directives?

Jan A Staessen1, Eoin O’Brien2

1 Studies Coordinating Centre, Division of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2 The Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Jan A Staessen
Studies Coordinating Centre, Laboratory of Hypertension, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, Box 702, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; jan.staessen@med.kuleuven.be


"...practitioners should realise that recommendations can never replace sound clinical judgment or take precedence over the personal interaction between patient and doctor"

Abbreviations: ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker; CCB, calcium-channel blocker; NICE, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)1 and the Joint British Societies2 recently updated their recommendations for the management of hypertension. This short editorial commentary reviews some aspects of these guidelines1,2 against the background of other directives3–6 and identifies some areas of discrepancy that need further reflection. A detailed overview of the literature falls beyond the scope of this commentary, but references supporting our views are available in the guideline documents1,2,4–6 or in our previous publications.7–9

BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT

The management of hypertension rests on the accurate assessment of blood pressure. Compared to conventional blood pressure measurement, automated techniques of recording, especially ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), provide a more precise estimate of a patient’s usual blood pressure, exclude observer bias, minimise the white-coat effect, and refine risk stratification.10 In addition, ABPM gives information on the diurnal blood pressure pattern, the efficacy of 24 h blood pressure control, and the presence . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.