Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Heart 2008;94:1370-1371; doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.133777
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

EDITORIALS

How effective is prevention in coronary heart disease?

Margaret E Cupples1, Susan M Smith2, Andrew W Murphy3

1 Public Health Medicine and Primary Care, Queen’s University Belfast, Northern Ireland
2 Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
3 General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Correspondence to:
Dr M E Cupples, Department of General Practice, Queen’s University Belfast, 1 Dunluce Avenue, Belfast BT9 7HR, Northern Ireland; m.cupples@qub.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

To most general practitioners, the jewel in the cardiovascular prevention crown is secondary prevention. Patients are easily identified and of a limited number, their absolute risks are high, the interventions apparently straightforward and the impact significant. But how significant and for how long? The importance of determining long-term outcomes is highlighted by the 10-year follow-up study reported in this issue of the journal by Delaney et al (see page 1419).1 Their work is important: it is the first report of the longer-term value of a primary care based intervention in coronary heart disease (CHD).

EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS

Delaney et al remind us of evidence showing improved survival and fewer cardiac events among people with CHD 4 years after their enrolment in the intervention arm of a trial of nurse-led clinics in general practice.1 They now report outcomes after 10 years’ follow-up. Although more deaths had occurred in the control group after . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease: a 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial in primary care
E K Delaney, P Murchie, A J Lee, L D Ritchie, and N C Campbell
Heart 2008 94: 1419-1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.