HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart 2008;94:258-259; doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.126334
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gorog, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Malik, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gorog, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Malik, I.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIALS

Clot removal in AMI—worth the hassle?

Diana A Gorog1, Iqbal Malik2

1 E & N Hertfordshire NHS Trust and Imperial College, London
2 St Mary’s Hospital, London and Imperial College, London

Correspondence to:
Dr D Gorog, E & N Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Welwyn Garden City, Herts AL7 4HQ, UK; d.gorog@imperial.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is increasingly seen as the treatment of choice in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Compared with thrombolysis, with PPCI recanalisation of the vessel is almost guaranteed, and, with elimination of the culprit epicardial stenosis, the risk of reocclusion is greatly reduced. There is, however, one advantage to thrombolysis: if it successfully restores epicardial flow, it can penetrate distal to the lesion and lyse further small microthrombi in the downstream myocardial bed. The effects of thrombus embolisation continue to be a problem in patients undergoing PPCI, in whom angiographic evidence of embolisation occurs in up to 15%,1 and are clearly related to adverse clinical and functional outcome.2 3 Once present, angiographic no-reflow, the end result of distal embolisation, is difficult to treat and disheartening for the operator.

In this issue of the journal, Reho and colleagues describe the successful use of a filter embolic protection device to retrieve . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Coronary thrombectomy by retrieval of an open emboli-protection filter device
I Reho, C Gruner, and M Roffi
Heart 2008 94: 274. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society