EDITORIALS
Psychology in chest pain
Correspondence to:
Professor A Rosengren, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden; Annika.Rosengren@gu.se
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In recent years, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction has declined, but instead, admissions for angina and chest pain have increased substantially. Using data from the Scottish morbidity record, 225 512 first hospitalisations for suspected acute coronary syndrome were recently analysed.1 Between 1990 and 2000, population hospitalisation rates for angina increased by 79%, and for chest pain by 110%, while hospitalisations for acute myocardial infarction declined by 33%. Possible reasons for this apparent shift might be a move from presentation with infarction to angina, but also "threshold" changes for admission and diagnosis. Whatever the cause, however, this increase in hospitalisations for angina and chest pain has obvious implications for resources, finances and services.
Observation units for chest pain to avoid admission for non-coronary chest pain have been established, both to reduce waiting times for assessment and to improve risk stratification. Chest pain clinics have been demonstrated to be efficient. Use
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
