HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER		Author Keyword(s) Vol Page [Advanced]

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rosengren, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rosengren, A.

Psychology in chest pain

Correspondence to:
Professor A Rosengren, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, SE-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden; Annika.Rosengren@gu.se

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In recent years, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction has declined, but instead, admissions for angina and chest pain have increased substantially. Using data from the Scottish morbidity record, 225 512 first hospitalisations for suspected acute coronary syndrome were recently analysed.¹ Between 1990 and 2000, population hospitalisation rates for angina increased by 79%, and for chest pain by 110%, while hospitalisations for acute myocardial infarction declined by 33%. Possible reasons for this apparent shift might be a move from presentation with infarction to angina, but also "threshold" changes for admission and diagnosis. Whatever the cause, however, this increase in hospitalisations for angina and chest pain has obvious implications for resources, finances and services.

Observation units for chest pain to avoid admission for non-coronary chest pain have been established, both to reduce waiting times for assessment and to improve risk stratification. Chest pain clinics have been demonstrated to be efficient. Use . . . [Full text of this article]