HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart 2008;94:400-401; doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.118976
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manisty, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Francis, D. P
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manisty, C. H
Right arrow Articles by Francis, D. P
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

EDITORIALS

Ejection fraction: a measure of desperation?

Charlotte H Manisty, Darrel P Francis

International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College and St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr C H Manisty, International Centre for Circulatory Health, 59–61 North Wharf Road, London W2 1LA, UK; cmanisty@ic.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Ejection fraction is the most widely used measure of left ventricular systolic function, but why? It was initially adopted before the introduction of echocardiography, when ventricular function was assessed by ventriculography at cardiac catheterisation. To avoid the huge effort of calibrating ventriculographic volumes, ejection fraction was born as a quick way of quantifying function.

In this edition of Heart, MacIver and Townsend report their findings from a mathematical model that investigates the separated effects of changes to left ventricular (LV) mass and to longitudinal shortening, on ejection fraction (see article on page 446).1 They show that the increased radial wall thickness in LV hypertrophy means that ejection fraction may be preserved despite impaired long-axis shortening. This supports the growing evidence that ejection fraction alone may be an insufficient descriptor of systolic function.

As cardiology is no longer bereft of rapid, calibrated measures of systolic function with the . . . [Full text of this article]


Related Article

A novel mechanism of heart failure with normal ejection fraction
D H MacIver and M Townsend
Heart 2008 94: 446-449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society