HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart 2008;94:963-966; doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.143594
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G F
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cleland, J. G F
Right arrow Articles by Hobson, N.

FEATURED EDITORIAL

Patients with heart failure who require an implantable defibrillator should have cardiac resynchronisation routinely

John G F Cleland, Ahmed Tageldien, Nidal Maarouf, Neil Hobson

Department of Cardiology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull Royal Infirmary and University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK

Correspondence to:
Professor John G F Cleland, Department of Cardiology, University of Hull, Castle Hill Hospital, Kingston-upon-Hull, HU16 5JQ, UK; j.g.cleland@hull.ac.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Should patients with heart failure who require an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) get a device capable of delivering cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT-D) routinely? For those that like to read the conclusions first, the answer is "yes". It is difficult to justify implanting only a defibrillator in anyone who has heart failure and an indication for an ICD. Most of these patients should get a CRT-D device.

This conclusion might seem odd at first but the arguments are quite straightforward. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines1 suggest that patients with heart failure as a result of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) should get an ICD if their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is <35% and they also have non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) on electrophysiological monitoring, provided that the patient is not in end-stage heart failure and is not within one . . . [Full text of this article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society