HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Heart 2008;94:969-970; doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.138479
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lunde, K.
Right arrow Articles by Aakhus, S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lunde, K.
Right arrow Articles by Aakhus, S.
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EDITORIALS

Cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: measures of efficacy

Ketil Lunde, Svend Aakhus

Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Correspondence to:
Dr K Lunde, Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, 0027 Oslo, Norway; ketil.lunde@rikshospitalet.no

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

In clinical trials, the treatment effect of an intervention is usually measured as the impact on a prespecified end point. All-cause mortality is an ultimate end point and often regarded as the "gold standard" for cardiovascular trials. However, since major therapeutic breakthroughs like acute revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention, use of antithrombotic agents, β blockers, ACE inhibitors and statins have improved prognosis after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), large-scale studies are necessary to demonstrate improved survival by a new treatment. Another option is to use an intermediate end point like quality of life or functional capacity, which may be more closely linked to disease progression. From a patient perspective, improvement of such intermediate end points may be more important than the sole prolongation of life.1

An alternative to an ultimate or intermediate end point is to use a surrogate end point. The FDA defines a surrogate end point as a laboratory . . . [Full text of this article]


Relevant Article

Restoration of left ventricular synchronous contraction after acute myocardial infarction by stem cell therapy: new insights into the therapeutic implication of stem cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction
S-A Chang, H-K Kim, H-Y Lee, S-Y Choi, B-K Koo, Y-J Kim, D-W Sohn, B-H Oh, Y-B Park, Y-S Choi, H-J Kang, and H-S Kim
Heart 2008 94: 995-1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society