JournalScan
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
A third of patients hospitalised with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) have persistent occlusion of the infarct related artery at 72 h, despite the availability of several effective reperfusion strategies. This has led to interest as to whether some of the benefits seen with early opening of the artery could be achieved with later opening, the so called "open artery hypothesis". It is thought that late opening of occluded infarct related arteries after acute MI may improve survival (through lower risks of heart failure and sudden death from cardiac causes), ventricular function (revascularisation of hibernating myocardium and improved remodelling) and quality of life. To assess this hypothesis, the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with medical treatment alone in 2166 patients who had an occluded infarct-related artery 3–28 days after an MI, and found no evidence of clinical benefit from late arterial opening. This paper reports the
Register for free content
The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.
Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.
