Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
Published Online First: 20 May 2005. doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.051466
Heart 2006;92:301-306
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Impact of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease on treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes

J J Graham1, A Timmis1,*, J Cooper2, S Ramdany1, A Deaner1, K Ranjadayalan3, C Knight1

1 Department of Cardiology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, London Chest Hospital, London, UK
2 Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, Rayne Institute, University College London, London, UK
3 Department of Cardiology, Newham General Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Dr Charles Knight
Department of Cardiology, London Chest Hospital, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, UK; knightlch{at}aol.com

Objectives: To evaluate the impact the National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease has had on emergency treatment and outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Coronary care units of two district general hospitals.

Results: Data from 3371 patients were recorded, 1993 patients in the 27 months before the introduction of the NSF and 1378 patients in the 24 months afterwards. After the introduction of the NSF in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced (95 patients (4.8%) v 43 (3.2%), p = 0.02). This was associated with a reduction in the development of Q wave myocardial infarction (40.6% v 33.3%, p < 0.0001) and in the incidence of left ventricular failure (15.9% v 12.3%, p = 0.003). The proportion of patients receiving thrombolysis increased (69.4% v 84.7%, p < 0.0001) with a decrease in the time taken to receive it (proportion thrombolysed within 20 minutes 12.1% v 26.6%, p < 0.0001). The prescription of ß blockers (51.9% v 65.8%, p < 0.0001), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (37% v 66.4%, p < 0.0001), and statins (55.2% v 72.7%, p < 0.0001) improved and the proportion of patients referred for invasive investigation increased (18.3% v 27.0%, p < 0.0001). Trend analysis showed that improvements in mortality and thrombolysis were directly associated with publication of the NSF, whereas the improvements seen in prescription of ß blockers and statins were the continuation of pre-existing trends.

Conclusions: In the two years that followed publication of the NSF the initial treatment and outcome of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes improved. Some of the improvements can be attributed to the NSF but others are continuations of pre-existing trends.

Keywords: National Service Framework; coronary heart disease; acute coronary syndromes; treatment; outcomes


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Cubbon, R. M., Wheatcroft, S. B., Grant, P. J., Gale, C. P., Barth, J. H., Sapsford, R. J., Ajjan, R., Kearney, M. T., Hall, A. S., on behalf of the EMMACE (Evaluation of Methods and, (2007). Temporal trends in mortality of patients with diabetes mellitus suffering acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of over 3000 patients between 1995 and 2003. Eur Heart J 28: 540-545 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moscucci, M, Share, D (2006). Impact of health care initiatives on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.. Heart 92: 293-295 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Swanton, R H (2006). The National Service Framework: six years on. Heart 92: 291-292 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.