Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 November 2005

Heart. Published Online First: 10 March 2005. doi:10.1136/hrt.2004.049817
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Clinical use of multislice spiral computed tomography in 210 highly preselected patients: experience with 4- and 16 slice technology

Torsten Beck 1, Christof Burgstahler 1, Axel Kuettner 1, Andreas F Kopp 1, Martin Heuschmid 1, Claus D Claussen 1 and Stephen Schroeder 1*

1 University of Tuebingen, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: stephen.schroeder{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Accepted 1 December 2004


Abstract

Background: Multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) scanners can visualize human coronary arteries non-invasively. Comparative studies with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) revealed a high negative predictive value, suggesting that MSCT might be useful for the exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, MSCT might help to reduce the total number of ICA. Initially, 4-slice scanners were used, since 2002 16-slice scanners with improved temporal and spatial resolution are available. We used both scanner generations to evaluate the need for an ICA in patients (pts) with unclear chest pain. We report on our initial experience using MSCT coronary imaging, as well as on differences in diagnostic accuracy between 4-slice and 16-slice MSCT technology.

Methods and results: 210 pts underwent MSCT coronary angiography (4-slices: n=120, 16-slices: n=90, suspicion of CAD: n=159, suspicion of restenosis: n=51). Recommendations for further diagnostics were based on the MSCT results. A telephone interview was performed after 449+169 days to evaluate the further clinical course. MSCT detected significant lesions in 94/210 (45%) pts and an ICA was recommended. MSCT excluded significant lesions in 116/210 (55%) pts. An ICA was actually performed in 44/210 (21%) pts (corresponding results: 27/44 [61%], false positive: 11/44 [25%], false negative: 6/44 [14%]). No statistical differences were found between 4- and 16-slice imaging. No major cardiac event occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions: MSCT was found to be useful to evaluate the need for invasive diagnostics. However, the false negative results underline that further improvements of image quality are required until it might replace ICA in carefully selected pts.

Keywords: atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease, imaging techniques, invasive coronary angiography (ICA), multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.