Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 August 2006

Heart. Published Online First: 26 October 2005. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.067363
Copyright © 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Reviews

Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention

Philippe Pibarot 1* and Jean G Dumesnil 1

1 Laval Hospital Research Center, Laval University, Quebec, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: philippe.pibarot{at}med.ulaval.ca.

Accepted 2 October 2005


Abstract

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is present when the effective orifice area of the inserted prosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size. Its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The purpose of this review is to present an update on the present knowledge with regard to the impact of PPM on clinical outcomes. PPM is indeed a frequent occurrence (20-70% of aortic valve replacements) that has been shown to be associated with worse hemodynamics, less regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, more cardiac events, and lower survival. Moreover, as opposed to most other risk factors, PPM can largely be prevented by using a prospective strategy at the time of operation.

Keywords: aortic stenosis, Doppler-echocardiography, heart valve disease, heart valve prosthesis, hemodynamics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Heart Review series
Heart 2006 92: 7. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Suri, R. M., Zehr, K. J., Sundt, T. M. III, Dearani, J. A., Daly, R. C., Oh, J. K., Schaff, H. V. (2009). Left ventricular mass regression after porcine versus bovine aortic valve replacement: a randomized comparison.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 88: 1232-1237 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dumesnil, J. G., Pibarot, P., Carabello, B. (2009). Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Eur Heart J 0: ehp361v1-ehp361 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Urso, S., Sadaba, R., Aldamiz-Echevarria, G. (2009). Is patient-prosthesis mismatch an independent risk factor for early and mid-term overall mortality in adult patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?. ICVTS 9: 510-518 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Detaint, D., Lepage, L., Himbert, D., Brochet, E., Messika-Zeitoun, D., Iung, B., Vahanian, A. (2009). Determinants of Significant Paravalvular Regurgitation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact of Device and Annulus Discongruence. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2: 821-827 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Monin, J.-L. (2009). Prosthesis-patient mismatch: myth or reality?. Heart 95: 948-952 [Full Text]  
  • Jamieson, W.R. E., Germann, E., Ye, J., Chan, F., Cheung, A., MacNab, J. S., Fradet, G. J., Stanford, E. A., Bryson, L. A., Lichtenstein, S. V. (2009). Effect of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Long-Term Survival With Mitral Valve Replacement: Assessment to 15 Years. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 87: 1135-1142 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G. (2009). Prosthetic Heart Valves: Selection of the Optimal Prosthesis and Long-Term Management. Circulation 119: 1034-1048 [Full Text]  
  • Mohty, D., Dumesnil, J. G., Echahidi, N., Mathieu, P., Dagenais, F., Voisine, P., Pibarot, P. (2009). Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction.. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 39-47 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Narayan, P., Reeves, B. C., Rizvi, S. I.A., Shokrollahi, K., Ismail, H., Angelini, G. D., Nightingale, A., Caputo, M. (2008). Hemodynamic Evaluation and Midterm Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement With Size 19 Perimount Prosthetic Valve. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 86: 1799-1803 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mascherbauer, J, Rosenhek, R, Fuchs, C, Pernicka, E, Klaar, U, Scholten, C, Heger, M, Wollenek, G, Maurer, G, Baumgartner, H (2008). Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short-term and long-term mortality. Heart 94: 1639-1645 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Clavel, M.-A., Fuchs, C., Burwash, I. G., Mundigler, G., Dumesnil, J. G., Baumgartner, H., Bergler-Klein, J., Beanlands, R. S., Mathieu, P., Magne, J., Pibarot, P. (2008). Predictors of Outcomes in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Multicenter TOPAS Study. Circulation 118: S234-S242 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bleiziffer, S, Eichinger, W B, Hettich, I, Ruzicka, D, Wottke, M, Bauernschmitt, R, Lange, R (2008). Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on exercise capacity in patients after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Heart 94: 637-641 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dumesnil, J. G., Pibarot, P. (2008). Invited Commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 85: 1308-1309 [Full Text]  
  • Pibarot, P., Magne, J., Dumesnil, J. G. (2008). Prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement: back to reality.. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 135: 464-465 [Full Text]  
  • Qizilbash, B., Couture, P., Denault, A. (2007). Impact of Perioperative Transesophageal Echocardiography in Aortic Valve Replacement. SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 11: 288-300 [Abstract]  
  • Dhareshwar, J., Sundt, T. M. III, Dearani, J. A., Schaff, H. V., Cook, D. J., Orszulak, T. A. (2007). Aortic root enlargement: What are the operative risks?. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 134: 916-924 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G (2007). Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!. Heart 93: 780-782 [Full Text]  
  • Hachicha, Z., Dumesnil, J. G., Bogaty, P., Pibarot, P. (2007). Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis Despite Preserved Ejection Fraction Is Associated With Higher Afterload and Reduced Survival. Circulation 115: 2856-2864 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G. (2007). Prosthesis-patient mismatch in the mitral position: Old concept, new evidences. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 1405-1408 [Full Text]  
  • Lam, B.-K., Chan, V., Hendry, P., Ruel, M., Masters, R., Bedard, P., Goldstein, B., Rubens, F., Mesana, T. (2007). The impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch on late outcomes after mitral valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 133: 1464-1473 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pibarot, P., Dumesnil, J. G (2007). Prevention of valve prosthesis--patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible?. Heart 93: 549-551 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Magne, J., Mathieu, P., Dumesnil, J. G., Tanne, D., Dagenais, F., Doyle, D., Pibarot, P. (2007). Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Survival After Mitral Valve Replacement. Circulation 115: 1417-1425 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Topic Collections
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.