Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 April 2007

Heart. Published Online First: 25 October 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2005.086041
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE aortic valve prosthesis: the Scandinavian multicentre, prospective study

Rune Haaverstad 1, Nicola Vitale 1*, Asbjørn Karevold 1, Giangiuseppe Cappabianca 1, Arve Tromsdal 1, Peter Skov Olsen 2, Lars Köber 2, Halfdan Ihlen 3, Kjell Arne Rein 3 and Jan L. Svennevig 3

1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Trondheim, Norway
2 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
3 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nicola_vitale{at}lycos.co.uk.

Accepted 19 September 2006


Abstract

Objective The aim of this report is the prospective, multicentre evaluation of clinical results and haemodynamic performance of the Medtronic ADVANTAGE aortic valve prosthesis.

Methods and Results From April 2001 to June 2003 166 patients (M:F=125:41; mean age 61.8±11.8 years) received an aortic ADVANTAGE valve prosthesis. Complete cumulative follow-up was 242.7 pt-years (maximum 3.2; mean 1.6 years). Postoperatively patients underwent early (within 30 days) and one year transthoracic echocardiography. Thirty day mortality was 2.4 % (n=4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from complications and linearized rates were as follows: survival 96.9±1.6%; thrombo-embolism 94.7±1.3% (2.06 pts/yr); bleeding 99.4±0.6% (0.4 pts/yr); non-structural valve dysfunction 98.8±0.9% (0.8 pts/yr); reoperation 98.8±0.9% (0.8 pts/yr). Valvular mean pressure gradients ranged from 16±3 mmHg for size 19 to 7±2 mmHg for size 27, and the corresponding effective orifice areas ranged from 1.2±0.25 cm2 to 3.2±0.66 cm2. Overall, left ventricular mass significantly decreased (p< 0.0001) and fractional shortening increased (p< 0.0001) from postoperative to one year echo.

Conclusions Haemodynamic performance and early clinical results of Medtronic ADVANTAGE in the aortic position were satisfactory and comparable with those of other bileaflet valves in current clinical use.

Keywords: Aortic valve surgery, Bileaflet valve, Echocardiography, Mechanical valve prosthesis, Medtronic ADVANTAGE


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Haaverstad, R., Vitale, N., Tromsdal, A., Hegbom, K., Karevold, A. (2007). Intermittent incomplete closure of Medtronic Advantage aortic valve leaflets causes unnecessary reoperation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 134: 791-792 [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.