Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 December 2006

Heart. Published Online First: 28 June 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.092163
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

plasma haemostatic markers, endothelial function and ambulatory blood pressure changes with home versus hospital cardiac rehabilitation The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM)

Kaeng Lee 1, Andrew Blann 1, Kate Jolly 1 and Gregory Y H Lip 1*

1 City Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.y.h.lip{at}bham.ac.uk.

Accepted 2 June 2006


Abstract

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an accepted therapeutic intervention in patients post-myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary revascularisation. The effects of CR programmes, whether home-based or hospital-based, on haemostatic indices [as reflected by fibrinogen, plasma viscosity (PV) fibrin D-Dimer (an index of thrombogenesis), Willebrand factor (vWf, an index of endothelial damage/dysfunction), soluble P selectin (an index of platelet activation)], vasomotor function [using flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and ambulatory BP (ABP) in patients with CHD are unknown. Methods: 81 patients (66 male, 59¡À11 yrs) who were post MI or coronary revascularisation were randomised to comprehensive hospital-based (n=40) or home-based (n=41) CR. Plasma levels of vWf, D-Dimer, fibrinogen, soluble P-selectin (sP-sel) and PV, as well as FMD and 24-h ABP were measured at baseline and after 3 months of CR. Results: In patients who completed CR, levels of vWf, fibrinogen and D-Dimer were significantly lower and FMD improved (all p¡Ü0.001), whilst levels were unchanged in controls. There were also significant reductions in 24-hr mean SBP, DBP and MAP after completion of CR (all p<0.05). There were no significant differences between the hospital-based and home-based CR programmes on these indices. Conclusions: CR improves haemostasis, endothelial function and ABP in patients with CHD, with no significant differences between home- and hospital-based CR programmes. These effects may contribute to the beneficial effects of CR programmes on CV outcomes.

Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation, endothelial function, haemostasis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kirchhof, P., Bax, J., Blomstrom-Lundquist, C., Calkins, H., Camm, A. J., Cappato, R., Cosio, F., Crijns, H., Diener, H.-C., Goette, A., Israel, C. W., Kuck, K.-H., Lip, G. Y.H., Nattel, S., Page, R. L., Ravens, U., Schotten, U., Steinbeck, G., Vardas, P., Waldo, A., Wegscheider, K., Willems, S., Breithardt, G. (2009). Early and comprehensive management of atrial fibrillation: Proceedings from the 2nd AFNET/EHRA consensus conference on atrial fibrillation entitled 'research perspectives in atrial fibrillation'. Europace 11: 860-885 [Full Text]  
  • Bethell, H, Lewin, R, Dalal, H (2009). Cardiac rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Heart 95: 271-275 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.