Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 June 2007

Heart. Published Online First: 29 November 2006. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.102061
Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Can atrial fibrillation with a coarse electrocardiographic appearance be treated with catheter ablation of the tricuspid valve-inferior vena cava isthmus? Results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Dhiraj Gupta 1*, Mark J Earley 1, Guy A Haywood 2, Laura Richmond 1, Melissa Fitzgerald 2, Pipin Kojodjojo 3, Simon C Sporton 1, Nicholos S Peters 3, Paul Broadhurst 4 and Richard J Schilling 1

1 St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2 Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, United Kingdom
3 St. Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
4 Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.gupta{at}qmul.ac.uk.

Accepted 12 September 2006


Abstract

Objective To see if a strategy of ablating the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava isthmus (TA-IVC) is superior to electrical cardioversion to prevent recurrences in patients with coarse atrial fibrillation (AF).

Design Prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study.

Setting 4 tertiary referral hospitals in the United Kingdom.

Patients 57 patients with persistent 'coarse AF' (irregular p waves ≥0.15mV in ≥1 ECG lead)

Interventions Patients were randomised to receive external cardioversion (Group A, n=30) or TA-IVC ablation +/- DC cardioversion (Group B, n=27).

Main outcome measures Cardiac rhythm, scores on quality of life and symptom questionnaires were assessed at 4, 16 and 52 weeks post procedure.

Results 20 (67%) patients in Group A and 19 (70%) patients in Group B were in sinus rhythm (SR) immediately following their index procedure. At 4, 16 and 52 weeks, the number of patients in SR were 5 ,3 and 2 in Group A and 3, 3 and 1 in Group B(p=NS). The quality of life and symptom questionnaire scores were similar in the two groups at each period of follow up though they were significantly better in SR as compared to AF at each follow up visit.

Conclusions As a first line strategy TA-IVC ablation offers no advantages over DCCV for the management of coarse AF.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, catheter ablation, isthmus


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.