Register for email alerts and news feeds:
This journal | BMJ Group
rss
The most recent version of this article was published on 1 July 2008

Heart. Published Online First: 10 December 2007. doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.132662
Copyright © 2007 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society

Original articles

Incidence of Aortic Valve Regurgitation and Outcome after Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defects and Patent Foramen Ovale

Steffen P Schoen 1*, Alessandra Boscheri 1, Stefan A Lange 1, Martin U Braun 1, Joerg F Fuhrmann 1, Utz Kappert 2 and Ruth H Strasser 1

1 Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
2 Heart Center, Department of Cardiosurgery, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cardiology{at}email.de.

Accepted 13 November 2007


Abstract

Aims In recent years percutaneous, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASD) or patent foramen ovale (PFO) was introduced into clinical practice. To our knowledge, no longitudinal follow up study investigated the functional effects on heart valves caused by an interatrial closure device.

Methods and Results Between 2001 and 2006, 240 consecutive patients underwent percutaneous closure of an ASD or a PFO. Heart valve functions were defined by transesophageal echocardiography pre implantation and three, six and twelve months after defect closure. A primarily successful implantation procedure was performed in 98% of patients. Sufficient closure without residual shunt could be achieved in 89 % of patients with ASD and in 92% of patients with PFO. An overall major complication rate of 0,8% was apparent during the observation time (mean 27±15 months). Long-term follow up revealed newly developed or worsened aortic valve regurgitation (AR) in 9% of patients with ASD and in 10% of patients with PFO. A potential cause for developing AR may be tissue overgrowing of the device leading to changes in interatrial septal geometry and traction on the root of the non-coronary aortic cusp.

Conclusion AR occurred in 9% of patients with closed ASD and in 10% of patients with closed PFO. Indication for closure should consider this potential complication despite an otherwise safe interventional procedure.

Keywords: aortic valve regurgitation, atrial septal defect, long-term follow up, patent foramen ovale, percutaneous defect closure


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wohrle, J., Kochs, M., Spiess, J., Nusser, T., Hombach, V., Merkle, N. (2009). Impact of Percutaneous Device Implantation for Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale on Valve Insufficiencies. Circulation 119: 3002-3008 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McElhinney, D. B. (2009). Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Let's Keep the Heart in Mind. Circulation 119: 2967-2968 [Full Text]  
  • Meier, B. (2009). Stroke and migraine: a cardiologist's headache. Heart 95: 595-602 [Full Text]  
  • Wahl, A, Meier, B (2009). Patent foramen ovale and ventricular septal defect closure. Heart 95: 70-82 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article

Services
Citing Articles
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bookmark with

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.