rss
Heart 100:214-218 doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304946
  • Aortic and vascular disease
  • Original article

Retrospective analysis of the effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker versus β-blocker on aortic root growth in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome

  1. Thomas S Mir1
  1. 1Clinic for Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  2. 2Clinic for Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  1. Correspondence to PD Dr. Thomas S Mir, Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University Heart Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, D-20246, Germany; mir{at}uke.de
  • Received 11 September 2013
  • Revised 28 October 2013
  • Accepted 30 October 2013
  • Published Online First 22 November 2013

Abstract

Objectives Cardiovascular pathology, including aortic root dilation at the level of sinus of Valsalva (SV), is one of the major causes of morbidity in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). β-Blocker (BB) is well established to slow aortic dilation in MFS. Less is known about the effectiveness of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on aortic dilation in paediatric patients with MFS.

Methods 215 patients with MFS (9.01±5.7 years) were subject to a standardised diagnostic programme. Aortic root dilation was evaluated and followed up by echocardiography. In 48 cases, BB and ARB effects on aortic root dilation were evaluated. Effect of treatment was measured by comparison of z scores of SV before and after treatment initiation.

Results Treatment by ARB and BB leads to significant reduction of SV dilation (p<0.05). The deviation of SV enlargement from normal as expressed by the rate of change in z scores was significantly reduced by a mean difference of −0.56±0.71 z scores (p<0.001) under ARB therapy and by a mean difference of −0.35±0.68 z scores (p<0.05) under BB therapy. The prophylactic effect of ARB and BB on aortic root dilation is similar in both groups (p>0.05).

Conclusions Both concepts lead to a significant reduction of SV dilation. The effect of ARB and BB is similar. This is the first study concerning the comparison of ARB and BB in previously untreated paediatric patients with MFS. The results of the study show that both treatment strategies are beneficial in paediatric and adolescent patients.