Article Text

PDF
104 Changes in Resting Microvascular Resistance Explain Why Resting Flow is Preserved Despite Increasing Stenosis Severity: The Results of the Largest International Combined Coronary Pressure and Flow Study
  1. Sukhjinder Nijjer1,
  2. Guus de Waard2,
  3. Tim van de Hoef3,
  4. Sayan Sen1,
  5. Ricardo Petraco1,
  6. Mauro Echavarria-Pinto4,
  7. Martijn van Lavieren3,
  8. Ibrahim Danad5,
  9. Paul Knaapen5,
  10. Javier Escaned4,
  11. Jan Piek3,
  12. Niels Van Royen5,
  13. Justin Davies1
  1. 1Imperial College London
  2. 2VU Medical Center
  3. 3Amsterdam Medical Center
  4. 4Clinico San Carlos
  5. 5VU University Medical Center

Abstract

Background We sought to use combined intracoronary pressure and flow velocity measurements to elucidate of the behaviour of the human coronary circulation in response to a stenosis.

Methods 567 coronary vessels underwent simultaneous intracoronary pressure and flow velocity assessments, from which coronary flow velocity, transtenotic gradient (TG) and microvascular resistance (MVR) were computed. Measurements were made during rest over the whole cardiac cycle and the diastolic wave-free period (wfp), and also during adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. Stenoses was stratified according to severity as objectively determined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Data is mean±SEM. Linear regression analysis estimated trends and P-values.

Results The key results are shown in the Figure 1. As stenosis severity increases, from reference angiographically normal vessels to those with FFR≤0.50, resting flow velocity changed little (whole cycle, 18 ± 0.5 cm/s; p = 0.40, wfp, 25 ± 0.7 cm/s, p = 0.30). In contrast, hyperaemic flow falls from 45 to 19 cm/s (P < 0.01). With increasing stenosis severity, distal pressure falls such that the TG increases from 1.5 to 46 mmHg at rest (whole cycle) and 1.6 to 56 mmHg for wfp; hyperaemic TG similarly falls from 3.5 to 55 mmHg (P < 0.01 for all). Resting MVR declines as stenoses increase in severity, from 6.2 to 4.2 mmHg/cm/s at rest (P < 0.01), over the wfp from 4.4 to 2.0 mmHg/cm/s (p < 0.01); overall hyperaemic resistance was consistent across stenoses (2.3 ± 1.1 mmHg/cm/s; P = 0.19) but with a trend to suggest paradoxical vasoconstriction in severe stenoses.

Abstract 104 Figure 1

Behaviour of phasic coronary flow velocity, microvascular resistance and transtenotic gradient according to stenosis severity defined by FFR. Each physiological property is shown at rest over the whole cycle (grey), the resting wave-free period (red) and the whole cycle over adenosine-mediated hyperaemia (blue)

Conclusions With progressive stenosis severity, distal coronary pressure falls and transtenotic gradients enlarge but resting coronary flow is preserved and maintained by a compensatory reduction of microvascular resistance. This confirms coronary auto-regulation under resting conditions in humans and explains why resting pressure gradients can detect the haemodynamic stenosis significance. Resting gradients are therefore an assessment of the natural physiological response of a given coronary bed to the presence of a stenosis. This work is also pertinent for non-invasive approaches that attempt to model physiology using anatomy since we describe all three physiological parameters across a large dataset from real-world patients. Finally, the stability of resting flow across a wide-spectrum of stenoses suggests that it should be feasible to predict the change in a resting pressure index or gradient before stenting a given stenosis.

  • Coronary flow velocity
  • pressure gradient
  • microvascular resistance

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.