Article Text

PDF
Original article
Coronary anatomy as related to bicuspid aortic valve morphology
  1. Wilke M C Koenraadt1,
  2. George Tokmaji2,
  3. Marco C DeRuiter3,
  4. Hubert W Vliegen1,
  5. Arthur J H A Scholte1,
  6. Hans Marc J Siebelink1,
  7. Adriana C Gittenberger-de Groot3,
  8. Michiel A de Graaf1,
  9. Ron Wolterbeek4,
  10. Barbara J Mulder2,
  11. Berto J Bouma2,
  12. Martin J Schalij1,
  13. Monique R M Jongbloed1,3
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Monique R M Jongbloed, Department of Anatomy and Embryology and Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Postal zone: S-1-P, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands; m.r.m.jongbloed{at}lumc.nl

Abstract

Objective Variable coronary anatomy has been described in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAVs). This was never specified to BAV morphology, and prognostic relevance of coronary vessel dominance in this patient group is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate valve morphology in relation to coronary artery anatomy and outcome in patients with isolated BAV and with associated aortic coarctation (CoA).

Methods Coronary anatomy was evaluated in 186 patients with BAV (141 men (79%), 51±14 years) by CT and invasive coronary angiography. Correlation of coronary anatomy was made with BAV morphology and coronary events.

Results Strictly bicuspid valves (without raphe) with left-right cusp fusion (type 1B) had more left dominant coronary systems compared with BAVs with left-right cusp fusion with a raphe (type 1A) (48% vs. 26%, p=0.047) and showed more separate ostia (28% vs. 9%, p=0.016). Type 1B BAVs had more coronary artery disease than patients with type 1A BAV (36% vs. 19%, p=0.047). More left dominance was seen in BAV patients with CoA than in patients without (65% vs. 24%, p<0.05).

Conclusions The incidence of a left dominant coronary artery system and separate ostia was significantly related to BAVs with left-right fusion without a raphe (type 1B). These patients more often had significant coronary artery disease. In patients with BAV and CoA, left dominancy is more common.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.