Responses

PDF
Original article
Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

  • Published on:
    Signficance of Inverse Prognostic Value of Post-PCI FFR in Patients with NSTEMI

    I read the article by Kasula and colleagues with great interest. I firmly believe that this is a novel finding and of great clinical significance (1).

    Utility of Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is firmly established in stable coronary artery disease but has been widely debated in patients with acute MI particularly in the culprit vessel (2, 3). FFR measurements require maximal coronary hyperaemia which may be les...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Microcirculation impairment in acute coronary syndrome: It is not always the same story
    • Matteo Tebaldi, MD_interventional Cardiologist
    • Other Contributors:
      • Gianluca Campo

    We read with great interest the elegant work of Kasula et al. recently published on Heart [1]. The Authors showed that fractional flow reserve (FFR) may be an effective tool to discriminate the long-term functional outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [1]. This retrospective study included exclusively ACS patients for whom FFR evaluation resulted "flow lim...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.