Article Text

PDF

7 Clinical impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance on the management of acutely hospitalised patients
  1. E De Garate,
  2. A Ghosh Dastidar,
  3. A Baritussio,
  4. A Scatteia,
  5. A Amadu,
  6. G Venuti,
  7. T Erdei,
  8. J Rodrigues,
  9. C Bucciarelli-Ducci
  1. NIHR Bristol Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, Avon, UK

Abstract

Background Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is invaluable for assessing ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. However, evidence regarding the incremental impact of CMR in acutely hospitalised patients is scarce. We evaluated the impact of CMR on diagnosis and clinical decision-making in this cohort.

Methods We evaluated 2481 consecutive scans (Jan 2014-Dec 2014) at a large tertiary cardiothoracic centre, identifying 283 patients referred for inpatient scans. Protocol included short axis-long axis cines, T2-weighted oedema sequences, early and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images. Definitions for “significant clinical impact” of CMR included change in pre-CMR diagnosis, influence on hospitalisation period, change in medication and on decision making for invasive medical procedures (CABG, angiography, ICD implantation).

Results Of the 283 patients, 8 were excluded due to poor image quality, leaving 275 patients (66% male, mean age 59yrs), mean ejection fraction of 46% ± 19. Patients underwent CMR for further assessessment of ischaemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy or congenital heart disease. CMR demonstrated significant clinical impact on 68% of patients. This included a completely new diagnosis in 27% of patients, change in management in 31% and 10% of patients that had both a new diagnosis and change in management. CMR results promoted invasive procedures on 27%, avoided invasive procedures on 16%; and influenced on hospital discharge on 15% of the patients (Figure 1). 84% of the patients had echocardiography prior to CMR. CMR confirmed echo diagnosis in 11%, complemented echo findings with significant new information in 41% and changed the echo diagnosis in 30% of the cases. In a multivariable model that included clinical/imaging parameters, age and presence of LGE were the only independent predictors of “significant clinical impact” (LGE p-value .007, OR 2.782, CI 1.328–5.828) (Table 1).

Conclusions CMR had significant impact in patient’s diagnosis and management in 68% of acutely hospitalised patients. Presence of LGE was the only independent predictor of significant clinical impact following CMR.

Abstract 7 Table 1

Logistic Regression Variables in the Equation

Abstract 7 Figure 1

Change in diagnosis after performing CMR in patients admitted with chest pain (A), shortness of breath (B) and arrhythmias-out of hospital cardiac arrest (C). (D) Overall significant clinical impact of CMR in change in management and new diagnosis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.