You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 102, Issue Suppl 5
  • 016 Patient preference in myocardial perfusion imaging - comparison between computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Abstracts
016 Patient preference in myocardial perfusion imaging - comparison between computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography
Free

Authors

Citation

Williams MC, Richardson D, Mirsadraee S, et al
016 Patient preference in myocardial perfusion imaging - comparison between computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography
Heart 2016;102:A6.

Publication history

  • First published May 5, 2016.
Online issue publication 
May 05, 2016

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© 2016, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions