Article Text

PDF

022 Novel perfusion CMR reference standard for the objective diagnosis of microcirculatory dysfunction – validation against prognostic invasive markers of coronary physiology
  1. Alexander Liu,
  2. Rohan S Wijesurendra,
  3. Joanna M Liu,
  4. John C Forfar,
  5. Keith M Channon,
  6. Stefan K Piechnik,
  7. Stefan Neubauer,
  8. Rajesh K Kharbanda,
  9. Vanessa M Ferreira
  1. University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Objectives In patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries, abnormal index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR ≥23) and coronary flow reserve (CFR ≤2.0) confer adverse clinical outcomes. We hypothesised that these prognostic invasive markers of microcirculatory dysfunction are related to impaired downstream myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) as assessed by CMR.

Methods 60 subjects (20 patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries, 20 patients with obstructive coronary artery disease [CAD] and 20 normal controls) underwent CMR for the assessment of LV function (cines), ischaemia (adenosine stress and rest perfusion) and infarction (LGE). During invasive coronary angiography, patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries had fractional flow reserve (FFR), CFR and IMR measured in all 3 coronary arteries (60 vessels), while patients with obstructive CAD had FFR measured in the obstructive coronary artery only (20 vessels). CMR images were analysed blinded to clinical information and invasive coronary data. MPR was derived as the ratio between stress and rest myocardial perfusion signal intensity upslope gradients, normalised to LV blood signal intensity.

Results Myocardium with LGE was excluded. Non-infarcted myocardium downstream obstructive coronary arteries (FFR <0.80) had lower MPR compared to controls (1.3±0.4 vs 1.9±0.3, p<0.001). Downstream of non-obstructive coronary arteries (FFR >0.80), myocardium with normal microcirculatory function (normal IMR and CFR) had similar MPR compared to controls (1.9±0.2 vs 1.9±0.3, p=0.83). Myocardium with prognostic microcirculatory dysfunction (IMR ≥23 and CFR≤2.0) had significantly impaired MPR (1.3±0.3, p<0.001); further, the degree of impairment in MPR was similar to ischaemic myocardium downstream obstructive coronary arteries (MPR 1.3±0.3 vs 1.3±0.4, p=0.73; Figure 1). On ROC analysis, a threshold of MPR=1.4 detected prognostic microvascular dysfunction (IMR ≥23 and CFR≤2.0) in non-obstructive coronary arteries with specificity 97%, sensitivity 81%, and accuracy 89% (AUC 0.95±0.02, Figure 2).

Conclusions In patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries, an MPR threshold of 1.4 on perfusion CMR accurately detects prognostic invasive markers of microcirculatory dysfunction. This novel MPR threshold can now be used to objectively diagnose microvascular angina in clinical practice and guide disease management.

Abstract 022 Figure 1

Patterns of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) in normal controls, and downstream of non-obstructive coronary arteries, and obstructive coronary arteries (CAD). All bars represent mean ± SD, *p<0.05, ns denotes p>0.10. IMR: index of microcirculatory resistance; CFR: coronary flow reserve; FFR: fractional flow reserve. Abnormal IMR/CFR was defined as IMR≥23 and CFR≤2.0. Normal IMR/CFR was defined as IMR<23 and CFR>2.0.

Abstract 022 Figure 2

Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) for diagnosing microcirculatory dysfunction (true positives: abnormal IMR≥23 and CFR≤2.0; true negatives: IMR<23 and CFR>2.0). AUC: area under the curve.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.