Article Text

PDF

007 Comprehensive echocardiographic and cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation differentiates between patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, hypertensive patients and healthy controls and identifies those with reduced exercise capacity on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
  1. Ify Mordi,
  2. Satnam Singh,
  3. Amelia Rudd,
  4. Janaki Srivanasan,
  5. Michael Frenneaux,
  6. Nikolaos Tzemos,
  7. Dana K Dawson
  1. University of Dundee, UK

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a comprehensive imaging protocol including echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the diagnosis and differentiation of hypertensive heart disease and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

Background Hypertension is present in up to 90% of patients with HFpEF and is a major aetiological component. Despite current recommendations and diagnostic criteria for HFpEF, no non-invasive imaging technique has as yet shown the ability to identify any structural differences between patients with hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF.

Methods We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 112 well-characterised patients (62 with HFpEF, 22 with hypertension and 28 healthy controls). All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise and biomarker testing and an imaging protocol including echocardiography with speckle tracking analysis and CMR including T1 mapping pre- and post-contrast.

Results Echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) and extracellular volume (ECV) measured by CMR were the only variables able to independently stratify between the three groups of patients. ECV was the best technique for differentiation between hypertensive heart disease and HFPEF (AUC 0.88; GLS AUC 0.78, p<0.001 for both). Using ECV, an optimal cut-off of 31.2% gave 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity. ECV was significantly higher and GLS was significantly reduced in subjects with reduced exercise capacity (lower peak VO2 and higher VE/VCO2).

Conclusions Both GLS and ECV are able to independently discriminate between hypertensive heart disease and HFpEF and identify patients with prognostically significant functional limitation. ECV is the best diagnostic discriminatory marker of HFpEF and could be used as a surrogate end-point for therapeutic studies.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.