Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Atrial arrhythmias and pacing after orthotopic heart transplantation: bicaval versus standard atrial anastomosis.
  1. S. C. Grant,
  2. M. A. Khan,
  3. E. B. Faragher,
  4. N. Yonan,
  5. N. H. Brooks
  1. Department of Cardiology, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND--Right and left atrial configuration is more normal when the donor left atrium is anastomosed to a recipient left atrial cuff with direct anastomoses of the donor and recipient vena cavas on the right side. The right atrium and sinus node may be less disturbed by the technique of bicaval anastomosis than by the standard procedure. OBJECTIVE--To compare the incidence of atrial arrhythmias and pacing after bicaval and standard anastomoses. METHODS--75 patients had heart transplants between January 1991 and December 1993. The notes were reviewed. Nine patients who died within the first 30 days were excluded from further analysis (seven patients with standard anastomoses, one with bicaval anastomosis, and one with a hybrid technique). RESULTS--66 patients survived for more than 30 days. Thirty five patients had standard anastomoses and 31 bicaval anastomoses. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia, or supraventricular tachycardia) occurred on four days in three patients in the bicaval group compared with 27 days in 13 patients in the standard group (P = 0.009). The relative risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias with standard anastomosis was 5.52 (P = 0.015) compared with that of bicaval anastomosis. Atrial tachyarrhythmias requiring treatment occurred less often in the bicaval group (four episodes in three patients in the bicaval group and eight episodes in four patients in the standard group), and fewer patients with a bicaval anastomosis required temporary pacing (pacing on 20 days in 10 patients in the bicaval group, but pacing on 49 days in 16 patients in the standard group) and late permanent pacing (no patients in the bicaval group and three patients in the standard group), although these differences were not statistically significant. Patients in the bicaval group were discharged from hospital sooner than those in the standard group (mean 24.1 v 29.1 days, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS--The technique of bicaval anastomosis, in addition to theoretical advantages from maintaining a more normal atrial configuration, has a lower incidence of postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias, may reduce the need for pacing, and allows earlier discharge from hospital.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.