Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: too young for a trial
  1. MOHAMMAD BASHAR IZZAT,
  2. ANTHONY P C YIM
  1. JOHN E SANDERSON
  1. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery,
  2. Department of Surgery,
  3. Division of Cardiology,
  4. Department of Medicine,
  5. The Chinese University of Hong Kong,
  6. Hong Kong
  7. email izzat@mailserv.CUHK.edu.hk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Recently, a variety of novel approaches and ingenious techniques have been developed in an attempt to make cardiac surgical procedures less invasive.1 Many of these methods remain largely experimental, yet one procedure seems to have been rapidly accepted by cardiac surgeons. In minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) the heart is approached via a right or left anterior mini-thoracotomy through which an internal mammary artery is harvested and anastomosed to the targeted coronary artery under direct vision without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.2 ,3 Even though the MIDCAB procedure has been used for complex cases, the most common clinical use of MIDCAB has been for single vessel disease, predominantly involving the left anterior descending coronary artery. Indeed, several recent reports have claimed that the clinical outcome of patients managed with this approach is favourable.2-4

Not surprisingly, there are calls for randomised controlled trials of MIDCAB against …

View Full Text