Article Text


Comparison of the long term prognostic value of peak exercise oxygen pulse and peak oxygen uptake in patients with chronic heart failure
  1. A Cohen-Solala,
  2. P Barniera,
  3. F Pessioneb,
  4. P Seknadjia,
  5. D Logearta,
  6. T Laperchea,
  7. R Gourgona
  1. aService de Cardiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France, bDépartement d’Epidémiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  1. Pr A Cohen-Solal, Service de Cardiologie—Hôpital Beaujon, 100 Boulevard du General Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.


Objective To evaluate the ratio of peak oxygen consumption to peak heart rate (peak oxygen pulse) as a predictor of long term prognosis in chronic heart failure.

Patients and setting 178 consecutive heart failure patients recruited to the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 1986 and 1993.

Design Bicycle ergometry with measurement of respiratory exchange. Mean (SD) follow up was 32 (25) months.

Results Patients who died had a lower peak oxygen consumption (16.0 (5.5) v 18.0 (5.5) ml/min/kg, p = 0.05), lower indexed peak oxygen consumption (52 (14) v60 (16)%, p = 0.006) but similar peak oxygen pulse (8.4 (2.6) v 8.4 (3.0) ml/beat, NS). The following variables were associated with a good long term prognosis: New York Heart Association class II, non-ischaemic heart failure, peak oxygen consumption ⩾ 17 ml/min/kg, indexed peak oxygen consumption > 63%. Peak oxygen pulse did not have predictive value. Only indexed peak oxygen consumption remained an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions Peak oxygen pulse has lower prognostic value than peak oxygen consumption, especially when the latter is indexed to predicted values.

  • prognosis
  • oxygen consumption
  • oxygen pulse
  • exercise
  • heart failure

Statistics from

Chronic heart failure carries a mortality rate of 10–50% at one year, depending on severity.1-3 Peak oxygen consumption during graded exercise has emerged in recent years as one of the most important independent factors in the prognosis of chronic heart failure,4-12 and is now one of the main elements guiding the decision to carry out heart transplantation.13Unfortunately, follow up has generally been limited, ruling out analyses of long term survival. Moreover, peak oxygen consumption has generally been expressed in ml/min/kg,14 and the use of indexed peak oxygen consumption, which also takes account of both age and sex, remains under debate.15 16 Finally, the peak oxygen pulse (the ratio of peak oxygen consumption to peak heart rate), that is, the product of stroke volume multiplied by the arteriovenous oxygen difference—which seems to be more dependent than peak oxygen consumption on cardiac pump function reserve (as it does not incorporate heart rate reserve)—has never been evaluated.

The aim of this study was thus to determine the prognostic value of peak oxygen pulse and peak oxygen uptake in the long term in a large population of consecutively investigated patients with heart failure.



Since 1985, all patients referred to our cardiology department with heart failure have performed a maximum graded exercise test. Hospital inpatients do the exercise test on discharge. We excluded from this study those patients whose heart failure was predominantly due to severe valve disease and the few who exercised on a treadmill. We carefully reviewed the raw data and excluded patients who stopped exercising for reasons other than dyspnoea or fatigue (poor motivation, arrhythmias, myocardial ischaemia, sudden drop in blood pressure, respiratory insufficiency, and so on). Heart failure was diagnosed on the basis of the usual clinical criteria—that is, exertional dyspnoea, peripheral oedema, or episodes of pulmonary congestion—together with evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction on echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography, or haemodynamic studies. Most patients were receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors plus diuretics.

There were 183 consecutive patients who were considered for analysis on this basis. Five were excluded because data were incomplete. The study cohort thus comprised 178 patients, recruited between 1986 and 1993.


Exercise tests were performed on a bicycle. Ongoing treatments were not stopped before the test. We used upright graded exercise with workload increments of 10 watts per minute after an initial workload of 20 watts. We always encouraged patients to exercise until exhaustion. Respiratory gases were analysed on a Medical Graphics Corporation system (St Paul, Minnesota, USA). The equipment was calibrated with a standard gas mixture before each test.

Oxygen consumption (V˙O2), carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation, and the respiratory exchange ratio were measured on a breath by breath basis and the results were averaged across 15 second intervals. All patients reached their ventilatory threshold, determined by use of the combination of multiple graphs17; all but three had a respiratory exchange ratio of > 1.0 (those three patients had a ratio of 0.98 or 0.99 and attained more than 90% of maximum predicted heart rate at peak exercise).

Peak oxygen consumption was defined as the highest averaged oxygen consumption value during the test and was expressed in ml/min/kg.

The peak oxygen pulse was defined as peak oxygen consumption divided by peak heart rate and was expressed in ml per beat. The indexed peak oxygen consumption (%) was calculated as peak oxygen consumption divided by maximum predicted oxygen consumption, using the values reported by Wasserman et al.18


The other candidate prognostic variables were age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class,19 aetiology of heart failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Aetiologies were separated into ischaemic and non-ischaemic heart failure. Ischaemic heart failure was defined by the presence of severe coronary artery lesions, and a history of myocardial infarction or akinesia on cross sectional echocardiography. Heart failure of other causes (alcoholic, toxic, idiopathic, etc) was defined as non-ischaemic. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured in 158 patients by means of radionuclide or contrast ventriculography (n = 144) or echocardiography (n = 14), using the Teichholz formula.


Minimum follow up was six months. Outcome was assessed either directly (when the patient’s physician was a member of the medical staff), or by contacting the patient’s practitioner by letter or telephone. The date and cause of death was documented in every case except for five patients, for whom analysis was censored at the last date when they were known to be alive. All 35 deaths were cardiac deaths. Twenty three patients underwent cardiac transplantation during follow up. As this procedure may alter prognosis, two methods of analysing outcome were used: first, censoring patients who underwent cardiac transplantation at the time of intervention (considering them alive at this time); second, considering transplantation as death, as the separation between urgent and non-urgent transplantation is disputable.


We used the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina). Numerical values are expressed as mean (SD). Differences between the means of groups was made by the Student ttest. Proportions were compared using the χ2 test. p values of 0.05 or less are considered significant.

Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality curves were plotted to the end of follow up to describe trends in mortality over time in each of the risk categories.20 Survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.

Relative risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CI), described by the relative hazard constant, exp(β) (β being the regression coefficient), were calculated by a Cox proportional hazards method21 for the following variables: age, NYHA functional class, aetiology, left ventricular ejection fraction, peak oxygen consumption, peak oxygen pulse, and indexed peak oxygen consumption. For continuous variables, when the statistical test was significant, we looked at the cut off value that discriminated best between survivors and non-survivors. Variables predictive of survival by univariate analysis (p < 0.05) were then entered in a Cox proportional hazards regression model to determine their significance as independent predictors of survival in multivariate analysis. We thus used three models—peak oxygen consumption, indexed peak oxygen consumption, or peak oxygen pulse—adjusted for the other covariates. If one or more of the variables was unavailable, the patient was excluded from the analysis.



Clinical details are given in table 1. There were 161 men (90%) and 17 women (10%). Mean age was 52 (11) years. The aetiology of heart failure was ischaemic in 75 cases (42%) and non-ischaemic in 103 cases (58%). At baseline, 76 patients (43%) were in NYHA functional class II, 81 (45%) in class III, and 21 (12%) in class IV. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 25(11)%. All but six patients had sinus rhythm.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Mean peak oxygen consumption was 17.6 (5.6) ml/min/kg in the whole population (range 6.5–39 ml/min/kg). Fifty patients were in class A, 59 in class B, 59 in class C, and 10 in class D, according to the usual classification.14 Mean indexed peak oxygen consumption was 58(16)%. The mean peak oxygen pulse was 8.7 (3.0) ml/beat.


Mean follow up was 32 (25) months. Mortality rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 13%, 19%, and 35%, respectively.

There was no difference between survivors and non-survivors as regards sex or age (table 2). The discriminatory value of the NYHA functional class was not statistically significant (p = 0.1); it poor remained even when patients were stratified into two groups only (class II or classes III–IV) (p = 0.05). Patients with ischaemic heart failure had a worse prognosis than those with non-ischaemic heart failure (p = 0.05). As in most recent studies, left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ between survivors and non-survivors (26(11)v 23(13)%, p = 0.3). Patients who died had lower peak oxygen consumption (16.0 (5.5) v 18.0 (5.5) ml/min/kg, p = 0.05) and lower indexed peak oxygen consumption (52(14) v60(16)%, p = 0.006) than those who survived. Sixty two per cent of the patients who died had a peak oxygen consumption ⩾ 14 ml/min/kg.

Table 2

Comparison of survivors and non-survivors

The peak oxygen pulse did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.1).

Survival curves

Ischaemic heart failure carried a worse prognosis than non-ischaemic heart failure, as did functional class III–IV compared with functional class II (both p = 0.03). An ejection fraction cut off of 23% had a poor, not significant, discriminatory value (p = 0.06) in this population. Peak oxygen consumption (p = 0.002) and indexed peak oxygen consumption (p = 0.0003) were highly predictive of survival, with cut off values of 17 ml/min/kg and 63% respectively (fig 1) (table 3). The peak oxygen pulse (cut off value 8.6 ml/beat) did not discriminate between survivors and non-survivors (fig 2).

Figure 1

Probability of survival according to the baseline indexed peak oxygen consumption (V˙O2), expressed as a percentage of predicted values, greater or lower than 63%. Curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method (p = 0.0003).

Table 3

Survival curves

Figure 2

Probability of survival according to baseline peak oxygen pulse (peak O2 pulse). The cut off value was 8.6 ml. Curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method (p = NS).

Univariate and multivariate analysis

Univariate analyses of covariates as continuous variables yielded significant results only for peak oxygen consumption (Wald χ2 = 4.5, p = 0.03) and indexed peak oxygen consumption (Wald χ2 = 10.5, p = 0.001) (table 4). Risk ratio were 1.07 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.13) for peak oxygen consumption (ml/min/kg) and 1.04 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.06) for indexed peak oxygen consumption (per cent of the predicted values). Considering the covariates as categorical variables, relative risk were 2.96 (95% CI 1.47 to 6.17, p = 0.004) for peak oxygen consumption (cut off value 17 ml/min/kg), 4.91 (95% CI 1.90 to 12.67, p = 0.001) for indexed peak oxygen consumption (cut off value 63%), and only 1.28 (95% CI 0.66 to 2.50, NS) for peak oxygen pulse (cut off value 8.6 ml/beat).

Table 4

Univariate and multivariate predictive value of survival of exercise derived variables

Functional class, aetiology, and one of the three exercise variables (peak oxygen consumption, indexed peak oxygen consumption, or peak oxygen pulse) were each entered in one Cox model to determine the independent predictive value of each of the exercise derived variables. Peak oxygen consumption was predictive of survival (cut off value 17 ml/min/kg) (p = 0.03). The peak oxygen pulse did not have independent predictive value (p = 0.3). Indexed peak oxygen consumption (p = 0.006) was the best independent predictor of survival.

Other analyses

When equating cardiac transplantation with death, the number of events increased and aetiology, NYHA class, peak oxygen consumption, and indexed peak oxygen consumption, but not peak oxygen pulse, had prognostic value (table 5). Finally, excluding the six patients in atrial fibrillation did not increase the prognostic value of the peak oxygen pulse.

Table 5

Survival curves


This study is one of the largest conducted in a single centre7 15 22 to have assessed the prognostic value of peak oxygen consumption in patients with heart failure, and has the longest mean follow up (32 months) so far reported, allowing long term survival to be assessed. The main findings were that indexed peak oxygen consumption was the best independent predictor of long term survival in these patients with heart failure, whereas the prognostic value of the peak oxygen pulse was low.

In the last 10 years, various investigators have tried to assess the prognostic value of peak oxygen consumption measured during graded exercise in patients with heart failure. All except one8showed its considerable predictive value for outcome.4-12 15 16 23-25 However, because of methodological differences (differences in cohort size, follow up, analysis of outcome after transplantation, or severity of heart failure at entry in the study), the cut off value that best predicts outcome has varied considerably from one study to the next. The fact that our cut off values are greater than those reported in most previous studies4 6 7 9 26 is probably due to the broad spectrum of heart failure in our study, in which both hospital inpatients ambulatory patients were enrolled (one year mortality was 13%, a figure similar to those recently reported in the enalapril arms of the SOLVD2 and V-HeFT II3 trials), or to our long duration of follow up. Clearly, the longer the follow up, the higher the peak oxygen consumption cut off value. The duration of follow up in our study in the longest so far reported. In Mancini’s study, from which is derived the “gold number” of 14 ml/min/kg,9 all patients were referred for heart transplantation and duration of follow up was only 11 months on average.

Age, sex, and previous training influence predicted maximum oxygen consumption. Various tables have been proposed to predict the actual maximum exercise induced oxygen consumption,18 27 but their validity in deconditioned patients with heart failure is open to question. One patient out of six was classified differently according to one or other classification. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that indexed peak oxygen consumption was more predictive than non-indexed values, in accordance with two recently reported studies15 16; However, from a clinical standpoint, the increment in the prognostic information was not as great as we expected and one may consider that indexed and non-indexed values of peak oxygen consumption have roughly similar prognostic value. This may in part be due to the fact that our population lacked very young or very old patients, who do not often have heart failure or who are less often exercised, respectively.

Another issue that we sought to address was whether the peak oxygen pulse was a better predictor of outcome than peak oxygen consumption, an issue not previously examined. Our hypothesis was that a large chronotropic reserve, due to young age or to previous training, may in theory compensate for a low stroke volume and maintain exercise cardiac output; it might thus be useful to eliminate the confounding role of heart rate by using the oxygen pulse, which is the product of stroke volume and arteriovenous oxygen difference. Surprisingly, our results showed that peak oxygen pulse had a low prognostic value. This suggests that heart failure is associated with a reduced chronotropic reserve during exercise28 (because of down regulation of atrial β adrenergic receptors,29 altered kinetics of the sympathetic response,30 resting tachycardia, or simply because symptoms lead the patient to stop exercising before reaching the maximum predicted heart rate), which participates in the exercise limitation and perhaps carries its own prognostic value, as recently suggested from large epidemiological studies.31 Atrial fibrillation may also alter the predictive value of the peak oxygen pulse, but this does not seem to have been the case in the present study; however, the study does not have the power to address the question of whether peak oxygen pulse has a different predictive value in patients with atrial fibrillation because of the limited number of patients.


We found that peak oxygen consumption was the best predictor of vital outcome at long term in patients with heart failure, especially when indexed to predicted values. The peak oxygen pulse did not have prognostic value.


This work was supported by INSERM grant No 9110405.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.