Objective To compare a new internal cardioversion system incorporated into a balloon guided catheter with a conventional two electrode system in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Design Prospective study.
Patients 74 patients with chronic AF treated by internal cardioversion.
Materials A 7.5 F balloon catheter with high energy electrode arrays each consisting of six 0.5 cm platinum rings. Brachial vein access enables one electrode array to be placed in the left pulmonary artery (distal pole) and the other at the lateral right atrial wall (proximal pole). The conventional two electrode system consists of 6 F electrodes placed in the proximal left pulmonary artery (anode) and the lower right atrium.
Interventions Internal cardioversion was performed by shocks delivered in 40 V incremental steps from an external defibrillator. Shocks were applied by the new device to 32 patients (group A) and by the conventional sysytem to 42 patients (group B).
Results The groups differed with respect to system positioning (9.2 (7.3) v 12.3 (8.1) minutes, p < 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (1.7 (1.0) v 3.3 (2.1) minutes, p < 0.01). Sinus rhythm was restored in 30 patients of group A and in 39 of group B (NS) with mean (SD) energy requirements of 8.4 (3.1) J and 7.2 (3.1) J, respectively (NS).
Conclusions This new method of internal cardioversion has comparably high primary success rates and low sedation requirements with single and two lead systems.
- atrial fibrillation
- internal cardioversion
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common chronic cardiac arrhythmias. The prevalence of this condition increases with age and concomitant heart disease.1-4 The risk of thromboembolic events in patients with AF is about six times greater than in patients with sinus rhythm5; stroke volume and cardiac output are also diminished by up to 35%,6 7 and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity is reduced, especially in the presence of underlying heart disease.8 Thus, in principle the preservation of sinus rhythm is worthwhile.
Apart from pharmacological approaches leading to primary success rates of 40–70%,6 9-11 electrical external cardioversion necessitates deep sedation and has a reduced efficacy in patients with a high body mass index.12 13
A new method of internal cardioversion for restoration of sinus rhythm using optimised electrode positions that encompass as much atrial tissue as possible14 15 has been reported in animals14 16 17 and man13 15 18 19 and is superior to conventional external cardioversion in terms of primary success rates, energy requirements, and the need for sedation. Present data have been collected using two part internal devices, which despite their advantages compared with those of external cardioversion also have some disadvantages, such as lack of ventricular back up stimulation or prolonged fluoroscopy times.14 16 17
A new catheter has been devised to enable development of an optimal electrical field, to allow pacing and sensing of atrial and ventricular tissue and monitoring of haemodynamic variables. An important aim was ease of handling, keeping fluoroscopy times low and yielding similar primary success rates to those with conventional two part electrodes at comparable energy levels.20 Cardioversion with this catheter is compared with that achieved with a conventional two part electrode system in patients with chronic AF.
Patients and methods
Patients aged 21 to 75 years were enrolled if the following criteria were fulfilled: chronic AF of at least 14 days documented by serial electrocardiogram (ECG); effective anticoagulation with warfarin for at least two weeks (international normalised ratio (INR) 2.5–4.2); and absence of left atrial or atrial appendage thrombus (assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography immediately before cardioversion to preclude any thromboembolic risk).
Patients were excluded when there was evidence of digitalis toxicity, abnormal electrolyte concentrations, or hyperthyroidism. Furthermore, patients with a history of long QT syndrome or acute myocardial infarction within the past six weeks, or of embolism were excluded. Clinical examination was performed and a medical history taken. All patients underwent 12-lead electrocardiography, 24 hour Holter monitoring, chest radiography, and M mode (also for determination of left atrial size) and Doppler echocardiography. Routine laboratory and thyroid variables were also measured.
A total of 74 consecutive patients with chronic AF of at least two weeks duration (mean (SD) 10.0 (7.3) months, range 0.5–34 months) were evaluated. Informed consent was obtained from all patients after thorough explanation of the benefits and risks of the study. The study was performed according to the protocol approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Klinikum rechts der Isar.
Patients were treated by internal cardioversion using either the newly developed balloon catheter (32 patients, group A), in an attempt to minimise fluoroscopy time and simplify applicability of the device, or a conventional two part system (42 patients, group B) (table1).
Patients with AF were treated with warfarin sodium for at least three weeks before defibrillation. The dose was adjusted to maintain an INR of 2.5–4.2. Warfarin sodium was withheld 48 hours before cardioversion, and an INR repeated on the same day of less than 3.0 was required to perform the procedure because of the risk of bleeding from puncture sites. Administration of warfarin sodium was resumed after cardioversion and continued for either four weeks in patients who successfully reverted to sinus rhythm or indefinitely in those who remained in AF. The long term INR was adjusted individually according to patient characteristics.
PREREQUISITES AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW CATHETER
The single lead atrial conversion catheter (EP Med Systems, Mount Arlington, New Jersey, USA) is a 7.5 F, latex balloon tipped device for guidance through the heart that resembles a Swan-Ganz catheter (fig1). The high energy electrode arrays consist of six 0.5 cm platinum rings with a total active surface area of 2.5 cm2. The two arrays are separated by 18 cm. The catheter is advanced so that one electrode array is positioned in the left pulmonary artery and the other at the lower right atrial wall, the proximal of which forms the cathode (group A).20 21 Additional single electrode rings are located on the catheter for pacing and sensing of the atrium and ventricle. A central lumen offers the possibilities of guidewire application, blood sampling, pressure monitoring, and drug administration.
CONVENTIONAL TWO LEAD SYSTEM
The reference device for internal cardioversion of chronic AF (group B) was a catheter system consisting of two temporary, custom built 6 F catheter (Elecath, Rahway, New Jersey, USA) defibrillation electrodes with an active surface area of 2.5 cm2, each consisting of nine parallel stainless steel rings. The cathode catheter was positioned in the lower right atrium and the anodal one in the proximal left pulmonary artery. One separately connected electrode pole was used for sensing and pacing of the atrium (fig 2).20
Chronic AF was defined from the ECG as a narrow QRS complex rhythm without P waves or flutter waves and with an irregular ventricular response of at least two weeks duration. Successful cardioversion was defined as the resumption of sinus rhythm within 30 seconds of the shock and persisting for at least one minute.
PROTOCOL FOR INTERNAL CONVERSION
Internal cardioversion was performed in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. The patients were sedated with 5 mg diazepam given orally. An additional 2–12 mg midazolam was administered intravenously before cardioversion if requested by the patient.
In group A, the balloon guided catheter was advanced by brachial vein access (fig 3), not least for reasons of facilitated haemostasis after cardioversion in anticoagulated patients as compared with that when a femoral approach is used (table 2).
In group B, the two lead system catheter was inserted through the right femoral vein and placed in the lower right atrium and in the proximal pulmonary artery (fig 4).
In each group, placement time was measured as the time period starting with puncture of the respective vein and ending with connection of the electrode system in situ to the defibrillator immediately before cardioversion. Fluoroscopy time was measured by the radiation device itself during placement of the respective electrode system.
Biphasic shocks of 3 ms/3 ms pulse duration with phases separated by 0.2 ms were used for internal cardioversion. The shocks were delivered by an external defibrillator (Ventritex HVS-02, Ventritex, Sunnyvale, California, USA) and synchronised to the R wave with a minimum R–R interval of 500 ms. Starting with a test shock of 60 V intensity, the energy was increased in 40 V steps until either cardioversion or a maximum of 520 V, corresponding to about 12 J, was achieved. Criteria for discontinuation were patient discomfort, complications, such as induction of proarrhythmia or major bleeding, and shock energies above 12 J.
The shock waveform was digitised at 100 kHz and processed to evaluate waveform morphology, delivered voltage, current, energy, and electrode impedance using a customised Macintosh computer. Impedance and energy were calculated by a specially written LabVIEW software program (National Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA).
All patients were followed up in our outpatient department. A 12-lead ECG was obtained at one week, one month, and three to 12 months or earlier if there were symptoms suggestive of recurrent AF. All patients were treated with sotalol with at least 80 mg twice daily (mean daily dose 174 (54) mg, range 160–400) after effective conversion to sinus rhythm. Additionally, angiotension converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and digitalis were administered according to the patient’s clinical status. Anticoagulation was discontinued after four weeks in patients with persistent sinus rhythm.
Continuous variables are expressed as means (SD). Statistical univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s t test/analysis of variance as appropriate by statistical package for social sciences (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) with respect to influence of clinical variables, outcome, shock variables, and follow up. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS AND GENERAL RESULTS
There were no significant differences between the two internal cardioversion method groups (table 1). Maximum voltage was responsbile for treatment being stopped in patients with unsuccessful cardioversion. Despite only moderate sedation during internal cardioversion no trial was stopped because of patient discomfort.
EASE OF ELECTRODE SYSTEM PLACEMENT
Catheter placement time was significantly shorter in group A (9.2 (7.3) minutes) than in group B (12.3 (8.1) minutes, p < 0.05). Fluoroscopy time was also less in group A (1.7 (1.0) minutes) than in group B (3.3 (2.1) minutes, p < 0.01) (table 2).
ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND ACUTE EFFICACY OF CARDIOVERSION
Table 2 presents the results from the one part and two part internal cardioversion groups. The mean energy for successful cardioversion was 8.4 (3.1) J in group A and 7.2 (3.1) J in group B (two part catheter system; NS). Both treatments were comparable with respect to primary success rates (30/32 (94%) in group Av 39/42 (93%) in group B, NS).
LONG TERM CLINICAL OUTCOME
On an intention to treat basis, 17 of 30 patients in group A (57%) and 19 of 39 patients in group B (49%, NS) remained in sinus rhythm during a mean (SD) follow up of 6.6 (2.9) months (range 1–34) (table 2).
There were no proarrhythmic effects or thromboembolic complications after delivery of the synchronised shocks in either group. One clinically relevant haematoma occurred after intervention in group B (table 2). There were no meaningful increases in creatine kinase activities either before or six hours after cardioversion (53v 63 U/l, NS).
CATHETER POSITIONING AND FLUOROSCOPY TIMES
The major finding of this study comparing two different internal cardioversion devices is the ease of placement of the new balloon catheter system, reducing placement time by 25% and fluoroscopy time by 48%. This fact not only keeps radiation of patients and personnel low, but also, at least theoretically, facilitates placement by the aid of pressure curves readable from the monitor—that is, in settings where rapid cardioversion is mandatory without a fluoroscopy device. As this new electrode system is similar to a conventional Swan-Ganz balloon catheter offering additional facilities of haemodynamic monitoring, intravenous drug application, and transient cardiac sensing and pacing simultaneously, these qualities render it well suited for application in the electrophysiology laboratory as well as in emergency or intensive care settings.22 More than 30% of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery develop intermittent AF or flutter peri operatively.23 24 In this setting, the new electrode system would offer a means of rapidly cardioverting AF without the assistance of an anaesthetist; as it would when cardiologists want to perform cardioversion of AF in outpatient departments.
SIDE EFFECTS, TOLERABILITY, AND LONG TERM RESULTS
There were no differences in energy requirements, primary success rates, or procedure related symptomatic effects between the two groups. Moreover, preinterventional sedation was sufficient in all patients and none of the cardioversions had to be interrupted because of patient discomfort. Furthermore, an increase in creatine kinase activities was not detected, nor was there any meaningful difference regarding relapse rate into AF in the long term. Finally, clinically relevant proarrhythmic effects or conduction disturbances attributable to electrode positions or shock energies were not seen with either system,14 17 such that, in summary, both internal cardioversion modalities can be regarded as comparably safe.
This newly devised catheter for internal cardioversion of AF is equally effective as a conventional two part system in terms of primary success rates, energy requirements, and peri procedural sedation. There were no adverse events with either system. Advantages of the new balloon are its ease of placement, low fluoroscopy times, and the ability to perform cardioversions by cardiologists without the assistance of another group of doctors. In addition, as the electrodes are fitted to a modified Swan-Ganz catheter, the new system can be used to perform additional functions—for example, drug administration, blood sampling, monitoring of haemodynamic variables, catheter manoeuvres requiring the use of a guidewire, and stimulating and recording of both atrial and ventricular signals, the latter even during electrophysiological examination.22
The authors are grateful to Martin Coenen, MD, Marty Combs, BSE, Maria Montero, MD, and Parwis Fotuhi, MD, for their valuable assistance in conducting the study.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.