Objective To evaluate, in a pulsatile flow model simulating flow conditions in valvar stenoses, whether accurate determination of orifice area can be achieved by the continuity equation using automated determination of flow volumes based on spatiotemporal integration of digital colour Doppler flow velocities.
Methods A method for automated determination of flow volumes which takes into account the velocity distribution across a region of interest was examined using flow through a tube and various restrictive outlet orifices with areas ranging between 0.2 and 3.1 cm2. The sampling rectangle of the Doppler method was positioned proximal to the obstructions within the flow convergence zone for evaluating prestenotic flow volume. Stenotic jet velocities were recorded by continuous wave Doppler to obtain the integral under the velocity curve. Prestenotic flow volume was then divided by the velocity integral to calculate functional orifice area according to the continuity equation.
Results The presence of parabolically shaped velocity profiles across the prestenotic region was demonstrated by the Doppler method. Excellent agreement was found between prestenotic flow volumes measured by the Doppler technique and actual values (r = 0.99, SEE = 1.35 ml, y = 0.99x−0.24). Use of the continuity equation led to a close correlation, with a systematic underestimation of geometric orifice sizes. Correction of Doppler data for flow contraction yielded an excellent agreement with actual orifice areas.
Conclusions The study validated the accuracy of a Doppler method for automated determination of flow volumes for quantifying orifice area by the continuity equation. Prestenotic flow volume and functional orifice area could be evaluated reliably in the presence of non-flat velocity profiles. Thus the method contributes to the non-invasive assessment of valvar stenoses.
- Doppler echocardiography
- automated flow volume determination
- valvar stenoses
- pulsatile flow model
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Clinical studies in valvar stenoses have shown the diagnostic value of orifice area determination using the continuity equation based on Doppler echocardiographic measurements.1-9 It was recognised that there were potential shortcomings over the measurement of the variables necessary for the continuity equation. In particular, the assumption of a flat velocity profile across the prestenotic region is of critical importance, since prestenotic flow is usually evaluated by pulsed Doppler recordings of the velocity within the centre of the flow area. Flow acceleration close to the stenotic valve and subvalvar obstruction due to extensive calcification or septal hypertrophy may preclude a flat profile. A further requirement—namely that the echocardiographically measured geometrical dimensions of the valvar rings are equal to prestenotic flow area, which remains constant during the flow period—is also not optimally fulfilled. A method for determining flow volume which takes into account the velocity distribution across a flow region of interest and its variation during the flow interval may improve the evaluation of orifice area by the continuity equation since it is less dependent on these simplifying assumptions.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in a pulsatile flow model simulating flow conditions in valvar stenoses, whether accurate determination of orifice area by the continuity equation can be achieved, using a recently developed method for automated determination of flow volumes based on spatiotemporal integration of digital colour Doppler flow velocities. In particular, we addressed the question of whether measurements by this new method would allow us to evaluate actual prestenotic flow volume within the flow convergence zone close to an obstruction, where a non-flat velocity profile is present.
PULSATILE FLOW MODEL
The pulsatile flow model consisted of a closed circulation with tubes mountable into the circuit (fig 1). At the outlet of a silicone tube, the cross sectional area could be reduced by insertion of plates with various orifices. A computer adjusted pump provided flow volumes and pump rates with various programmable waveforms. The flow volumes were cross checked by an ultrasonic transit time flowmeter (T108, Transonic Systems, New York, USA). For all measurements, a glycerol-water solution (40:60) was used as test fluid with a physiological dynamic viscosity of 3.6 cP. For improved echo reflectivity 1% cornstarch particles were added.
DOPPLER SYSTEM AND PRINCIPLE OF FLOW VOLUME COMPUTATION
Colour Doppler imaging was performed with a Toshiba SSA-380A Doppler system (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a recently developed software for automated evaluation of stroke volume and cardiac output based on digital data of velocity recordings.10 The method allows selection of an optimal flow cycle from cine-loop stored colour Doppler images. For further calculation, the flow interval is then given by the time delay between the first and the last depicted frame. To ensure sufficient temporal resolution capabilities, high frame rates are available. A review of the entire selected cycle in real time is provided by the Doppler system.
Automated determination of flow volumes is based on the analysis of the velocity distribution across a region of interest within the colour coded image. The computational algorithm uses the digital velocities of the Doppler flow map and the system shows a sampling rectangle which can be positioned across the flow field of interest perpendicular to the central Doppler beam direction. Additionally, correction for angle deviations between flow direction and the orientation of the sampling rectangle is provided. The size of the sampling rectangle depends on the imaging depth z (in cm) used and measures 0.285 z horizontally and 0.0385 z vertically. The velocity distribution is delineated across five equidistant horizontal lines traversing the sampling box. For each frame, analysis of the velocity profiles v(r) (whereby v(r) denotes the velocity at a distance r from the centre) across the five sampling lines is performed and the profile of the middle line is subsequently shown on the screen for each analysed frame. The integral under the velocity curve is approximated by summation over the velocity–radius rectangles, ∑v(r) Δr, where Δr denotes the distance between two neighbouring scanning lines. Rotational spatial integration of the velocity areas, assuming a circular shaped flow area and hemicircular identity of the spatial velocity distribution, is carried out for each point in time during the flow interval, yielding instantaneous flow rates, π ∑ r v(r) Δr. Temporal summation of the flow rates over the number of registered flow frames through the entire flow interval, π ∑ ∑ r(t) v(r,t) Δr Δt (Δt denotes the constant time interval between two subsequent frames, which depends on the applied colour Doppler frame rate), is then performed, yielding five distinct flow volumes from which the mean value and standard deviation are calculated and depicted on the screen.
A fixed pump rate of 60 strokes/min was used for all recordings, and a sinusoidal waveform for the forward flow curves simulating ventricular outflow conditions was chosen (fig 2). Flow volumes between 20 and 90 ml (for the smallest orifice size up to 70 ml), varied in 10 ml steps, were delivered by the pump into the circulation. Measurements were performed at the outlet region of a silicone tube with a diameter of 3 cm and a length of 14 cm. Five different plates with sharp edged circular orifices with diameters of 0.5, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 cm (orifice areas of 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, and 3.1 cm2) were positioned into the outlet.
For all experiments, a transducer carrier frequency of 3.75 MHz was employed. The Doppler instrumentation settings were adjusted to the corresponding flow conditions with a pulse repetition frequency of 6.0 kHz and zero line shifting leaving about 75% of the velocity range for colour coded flow towards the transducer such that no aliasing occurred. Wall filtering was minimised and ranged between 76 and 609 Hz for the applied Nyquist velocities between 9.49 and 75.9 cm/s. Gain settings were adjusted to the various flow conditions just below the level where noise in the colour Doppler image occurred. The colour sector size was set to 26°. Using these machine settings frame rates between 24/s and 26/s were derived.
The transducer was located and fixed 8 cm away from the orifices at a specially constructed window in the model, and the central Doppler beam was oriented parallel to and against flow direction. Accordingly, for all experiments, the angle between flow direction and the orientation of the sampling rectangle was set to zero since flow direction was paralleled by Doppler interrogation. For colour Doppler imaging a constant depth of 12.0 cm was applied; thus a sampling box with a lateral width of 3.462 cm and a vertical depth of 0.462 cm was used. The sampling rectangle was positioned 0.5 cm proximal to the orifice for determination of prestenotic flow volume (FVD). From the identical transducer position and orientation, stenotic jet velocity through the orifices was recorded by continuous wave Doppler, and using a hand controlled cross wire cursor the Doppler spectral curve was traced along its envelope to obtain the integral under the profile (Int v). Stenotic orifice area (OAD) was then calculated by the continuity equation according to OAD = FVD/Int v. Since effective orifice areas were determined by the continuity equation, these data were also multiplied by the correction factor 1/0.65 for flow contraction behind an abrupt obstruction to derive geometric orifice areas.11For every discrete combination of flow rate and orifice size, a sequence of five colour Doppler flow cycles, as well as CW Doppler recordings through the centre of the orifices, was acquired on the ultrasound scanner.
All measurements were averaged over five cycles and results expressed as mean (SD). Actual and measured flow volumes, as well as calculated and true orifice areas, were compared by linear regression analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The repeatability of measurements was expressed as two standard deviations from the mean difference of five measurements for each orifice under various flow conditions according to the method of Bland and Altman.12
FLOW VOLUMES AND VELOCITIES
Analysis of the velocity distribution by the algorithm showed the presence of parabolically shaped profiles across the prestenotic flow region (fig 3). Flow volumes evaluated by the Doppler method averaged over all orifice sizes measured 19.2 (0.8), 29.3 (1.8), 40.1 (1.4), 49.6 (1.6), 58.7 (2.1), 69.8 (2.0), 79.6 (3.0), and 87.6 (2.3) ml for actual flow volumes of between 20 and 90 ml. Peak velocities of stenotic jet flows ranged from 0.1 to 6.5 m/s and the corresponding integrals under the velocity curves from 3 to 502 cm for the entire range of flow volumes and orifice sizes.
COMPARISON OF FLOW VOLUMES AND ORIFICE AREAS
The comparison of measured flow volumes derived by the Doppler technique and actual flow volumes showed an excellent correlation for each orifice size, with no relevant underestimation or overestimation (figs 4 and 5). For the entire range of measurements from all orifice sizes the overall agreement was characterized by:r = 0.99, SEE = 1.35 ml, y = 0.99x−0.24. With the application of the continuity equation the calculated effective orifice areas under the applied flow conditions measured 0.14 (0.05), 0.32 (0.01), 0.51 (0.02), 1.08 (0.03), and 2.15 (0.03) cm2 for the 0.2, 0.5, 0.8, 1.8, and 3.1 cm2 geometric orifice sizes, respectively. Thus the comparison of calculated and geometric orifice areas showed a close correlation with a systematic deviation of the regression line from the line of identity (r = 0.99, SEE = 0.06 cm2, y = 0.68x−0.03) (fig 6). Multiplying the functional areas with the correction factor of 1.54 for flow contraction a close agreement of Doppler data with actual geometric orifice areas was found (r = 0.99, SEE = 0.06 cm2, y = 1.05x−0.03) (fig 6).
There was excellent agreement between repeated measurements: two residual standard deviations measured 2.4 ml for the circular orifice with a diameter of 0.5 cm, 3.2 ml for 0.8 cm, 4.8 ml for 1.0 cm, 2.9 ml for 1.5 cm, and 3.9 ml for 2.0 cm for the applied range of flow conditions.
The major finding of this in vitro study was that with the use of a recently developed method for automated determination of flow volumes based on colour Doppler imaging, quantification of orifice area according to the continuity equation can be achieved, since it allows reliable evaluation of prestenotic flow volume and obviates the need for various simplifying assumptions. The approach takes into account the non-flat velocity profile within the flow convergence region of the stenoses. In addition, the applied approach may be less time consuming than the conventional application of the continuity principle based on echocardiographic and Doppler measurements. The calculated orifice areas showed a close agreement with the effective orifice areas and, since the flow conditions employed were similar to those in valvar stenoses, the method should lead to substantial improvement in the quantitative assessment of these lesions. In contrast to clinical studies, where the underestimation of geometric aortic and mitral valve areas reaches only about 15%, the underestimation in our study was more pronounced—and thus the correction factor for flow contraction was substantially higher—because the abrupt obstructions used in our study resemble an ideal nozzle far less than valvar stenoses.1 2 4 8 9 13 14
VALVAR RING VELOCITY PROFILES IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
Even in normal hearts the velocity profile in the left ventricular outflow tract has been shown to be non-flat, with the highest velocities occurring along the interventricular septum.15 16 Though such a skewed profile is present in healthy persons, the velocity measured centrally within the outflow tract renders an acceptable approximation of mean spatial velocity since the velocity values decrease continuously towards the anterior mitral leaflet. Because of this, numerous studies using the centrally recorded profiles by pulsed Doppler, and taking into consideration the corresponding area measured by echocardiography, have shown close agreement with actual stroke volume through the left ventricular outflow tract.17-23 At the mitral ring level, a non-flat profile was found even with normal valves and the centrally measured velocity is often not representative of mean spatial velocity.24
PRESTENOTIC ANNULAR VELOCITY PROFILES
The clinical use of the continuity equation for determining orifice area in valvar stenosis, in particular at the aortic valve, is often limited by the presence of a non-flat velocity profile in the prestenotic region.25-27 In valvar stenosis, an increase in flow velocity occurs in the proximity of the valve, with the highest velocities located in the centre of the cross section due to flow convergence. To avoid overestimation of prestenotic flow, the sample volume of pulsed Doppler must be located proximal to this region.9 This approach may result in recordings being made at a site substantially different from that at which the diameter of flow area is determined. The presence of marked leaflet calcification and septal hypertrophy in aortic stenosis may also prevent the occurrence of a symmetrical velocity profile. Further alterations in the spatial velocity profile at the mitral ring occur if annular calcification is present. Therefore in many clinical situations velocity measurements in the centre of the flow area that are based on the assumption of a flat velocity profile within the prestenotic region of the valve may lead to substantial errors in determining flow volume. Our data show that the new Doppler method allows reliable assessment of prestenotic flow in the flow convergence zone of an obstruction. The velocity profiles across this region were found to be parabolically shaped, with the highest velocities in the centre. Since the applied algorithm for flow determination takes into account the velocity distribution across a region of interest and not just the central velocity, no significant overestimation was found.
TEMPORAL ALTERATIONS OF FLOW AREA SIZE
With the conventional employment of the continuity equation, the diameter of flow area is usually evaluated at a particular time point, assuming that the measured diameter and calculated area remain constant during the entire flow interval. Even though this represents an acceptable approximation for the aortic ring, substantial changes in mitral ring size can occur during diastole. It has been shown that the ring area of the mitral valve can vary by 26% during the cardiac cycle and by approximately 13% in diastole in healthy persons.28 Accordingly, measuring the diameter of the flow area at a single time point during the flow cycle may lead to deviations of the calculated prestenotic flow and thus of orifice area. The Doppler method investigated here takes into consideration the changes of the dimension of the flow area during the flow period since an instantaneous diameter is determined from each colour Doppler image.
TIME AND EFFORT FOR APPLICATION
Clinical employment of the conventional method of orifice area determination by the continuity equation is time consuming since it requires accurate measurements of three distinct variables. In aortic stenosis, the dimension of the aortic ring is usually evaluated from a parasternal view, while prestenotic and stenotic jet velocities are recorded from an apical transducer position. Most investigators used the peak velocities of the prestenotic and stenotic jet flow velocity profiles, since time is not required to trace the velocity curves. Since with the use of this new method, prestenotic flow volume—usually derived from two separate measurements—can be determined within less than one minute from a single transducer position, the time needed for accurate measurement can be reduced.
Since this Doppler method uses the velocity information from cross sectional images, a potential source of error may result from the underlying assumption of a hemicircular symmetry of the spatial velocity profile. This may be specially relevant if skewed profiles are present because of septal hypertrophy or marked valvar calcium deposits in aortic stenosis. This situation was not simulated in the study; however, even under those circumstances a more reliable estimation of prestenotic flow volume is likely to be derived by the new method than by measuring flow velocity at a single point in the centre of the flow region. The degree to which non-symmetrical spatial velocity profiles impair the accuracy of the method needs further clarification.
An additional simplification in comparison with the clinical situation results from the assumption of a circular shaped flow area with the new method. The assumption is best fulfilled at the aortic and pulmonary ring level; however, substantially different geometries may be present at the mitral and the tricuspid rings.28 29 Thus the use of the method to take measurements across a single flow diameter may be restricted to the ventricular outflow tract regions. Though previous studies of mitral flow volume in normal individuals using a single diameter measurement showed a close agreement with invasive values, modifications of the method may be necessary to obtain a more accurate quantification of prestenotic flow.29
We also did not address the issue of angle deviations between flow direction and Doppler beam orientation. Theoretically, small angle deviations play a minor role in the accuracy of the method since the cosine function of the angle is involved in the determination of flow volumes.10 Accordingly, angle deviations of up to 20° are only associated with calculation errors of up to 6%. In addition, the algorithm allows for correction of misalignments using the cosine function of the angle between the central Doppler beam orientation and flow direction, as depicted by the operator with a moveable cursor. Since for large angles, however, Doppler recordings are impaired by a low signal to noise ratio, such angles will also impair the accuracy of flow volume measurements made by this method. Fortunately, in valvar stenosis small angles between prestenotic flow direction and Doppler beam orientation can usually be achieved by appropriate transducer positioning.
Finally, the potential influence of various machine settings such as gain and wall filtering was not investigated in this study. Corresponding to the clinical application, colour Doppler gain was adjusted to a level immediately below that at which noise is incurred, yielding excellent results in these in vitro experiments. The extent to which gain and wall filtering may affect the accuracy of the method was investigated in recent studies.30 31 Incomplete flow visualisation because of inadequate gain setting or attenuation of ultrasound was shown to be an important bar to reliable flow volume determination by the automated method31; in both the clinical and the in vitro part of this study, it was quite clear to the examiner when the colour gain was either insufficient or excessive for an optimal gain setting to be achieved. In an in vitro study, it was pointed out that attenuation effects were not negligible but were more pronounced if larger Doppler angles, lower flows, and high wall filter settings were employed, leading to various degrees of underestimation of flow calculations.30 Since no motion of the surrounding surfaces was present in our study, wall filters between 76 and 609 Hz were used. This may be too low a value for clinical application since strong reflectors such as surrounding walls in motion may influence the flow area image on colour Doppler and thus affect the calculated flow volume. The tissue priority algorithm of the instruments must also be taken into account for adequate imaging of the flow zone. Careful adjustment with the use of wall filtering and the motion artefact eliminator, which neglects strong and low velocity signals, may be necessary for reliable calculations.
Our data show the value of a new Doppler method for determining prestenotic flow volume, based on the spatial velocity distribution across the corresponding flow region for assessing orifice area with the continuity equation. The method, which takes into account instantaneous flow alterations by making determinations at several time points during the flow interval, should allow a more reliable measurement of flow volume in the clinical setting. Since rapid assessment of prestenotic flow volume can substantially shorten the time needed for accurate calculations, the method will improve the applicability of the continuity equation for assessing valvar stenoses.