You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 82, Issue 4
  • Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with 99mTc MIBI SPECT

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Paper
Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with 99mTc MIBI SPECT
  1. H J Verbernea,
  2. J J Piekb,
  3. R A M van Liebergenb,
  4. K T Kochb,
  5. J M Schroeder-Tankab,
  6. E A van Royena
  1. aDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands, bDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center
  1. Dr J J Piek, Department of Cardiology, Room B2—108, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. email:J.J.Piek{at}amc.uva.nl

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine the relation between the relative and absolute coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFVR) compared with the results of 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

METHODS In 37 patients with one vessel disease, 99mTc MIBI SPECT was performed before angioplasty, two to three weeks after angioplasty, and at six months’ follow up. CFVR was measured distal to the stenosis (dCFVR) as well as in a reference coronary artery before angioplasty, immediately after angioplasty, and at late follow up. Relative CFVR (rCFVR) was calculated as the ratio between dCFVR and CFVR measured in the reference coronary artery. The optimal thresholds for reversible perfusion defects were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS The agreement for the full range of coronary artery stenosis (n = 107, mean (SD) diameter stenosis 48 (28)%, range 0–98%) between dCFVR (cut off value 1.9) and rCFVR (cut off value 0.65) with 99mTc MIBI SPECT was 81% and 85%, respectively. In intermediate lesions (n = 49, diameter stenosis range 30–75%) the agreement between dCFVR (cut off value 2.0) and 99mTc MIBI SPECT was 72%, which increased to 78% using the rCFVR (cut off value 0.65).There was a strong linear relation between dCFVR and rCFVR (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS A best cut off value for dCFVR of 1.9 corresponds with a best cut off value of 0.65 for rCFVR, within the full range of coronary narrowings. Intracoronary blood flow velocity analysis could obviate the need for additional myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the majority of patients.

  • intracoronary Doppler
  • relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve
  • 99mTc MIBI single photon emission computed tomography

https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.82.4.509

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text