rss
Heart 2001;85:672-679 doi:10.1136/heart.85.6.672
  • Interventional cardiology surgery

Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study

  1. H Hemingwaya,
  2. A M Crooka,
  3. S Banerjeeb,
  4. J R Dawsonb,
  5. G Federc,
  6. P G Mageec,
  7. A Woodc,
  8. S Philpotta,
  9. A Timmisc
  1. aDepartment of Research and Development, Kensington & Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority, 50 Eastbourne Terrace, London W2 6LX, UK, bBarts and the London NHS Trust, Cardiac Directorate, Bonner Road, London E2 9JX, UK, cDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's and Royal London Medical School, Queen Mary and Westfield College, London E1 4NS, UK
  1. Dr Hemingwayharry.hemingway{at}ha.kcw-ha.nthames.nhs.uk
  • Accepted 20 February 2001

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness derived by an expert panel on hypothetical patients are associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and subsequent revascularisation in the ACRE (appropriateness of coronary revascularisation) study.

DESIGN Population based, prospective study. The ACRE expert panel rated hypothetical clinical indications as inappropriate, uncertain, or appropriate before recruitment of a cohort of real patients.

SETTING Royal Hospitals Trust, London, UK.

PARTICIPANTS 3631 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography (no exclusion criteria).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Angiographic findings, mortality (n = 226 deaths), and revascularisation (n = 1556 procedures) over 2.5 years of follow up.

RESULTS The indications for coronary angiography were rated appropriate in 2253 (62%) patients. 166 (5%) coronary angiograms were performed for indications rated inappropriate, largely for asymptomatic or atypical chest pain presentations. The remaining 1212 (33%) angiograms were rated uncertain, of which 47% were in patients with mild angina and no exercise ECG or in patients with unstable angina controlled by inpatient management. Three vessel disease was more likely among appropriate cases and normal coronaries were more likely among inappropriate cases (p < 0.001). Mortality and revascularisation rates were highest among patients with an appropriate indication, intermediate in those with an uncertain indication, and lowest in the inappropriate group (log rank p = 0.018 and p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION The ACRE ratings of appropriateness for angiography predicted angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rates. These findings support the clinical usefulness of expert panel methods in defining criteria for performing coronary angiography.

Footnotes

    This Article

    1. Abstract
    2. Full text
    3. PDF

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Latest from Education in Heart

    Latest from Education in Heart

    Register for free content

    The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

    Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.