Cardiac and vascular pathophysiology in hypertension
- International Centre for Circulatory Health, 10th Floor QEQM Wing, St Mary’s Hospital, and Imperial College Paddington and Clinical Pharmacology, NHLI, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London, UK
- Correspondence to:
Professor Alun Hughes, International Centre for Circulatory Health, 10th Floor, QEQM Wing, St Mary’s Hospital and Imperial College, Paddington, London W2 1NY, UK;
Hypertension is one the earliest recorded medical conditions (Nei Jin by Huang Ti around 2600BC); it has shaped the course of modern history1 and the consequences of hypertension (myocardial infarction, strokes, and heart failure) will soon be the leading global cause of death. Nevertheless, despite intensive research, the aetiology of hypertension remains obscure; only around 5% of cases have an identifiable cause.2 Indeed, primary or essential hypertension is perhaps better not considered a disease at all,w1 rather (as suggested by Sir Geoffrey Rose) a level of blood pressure above which treatment does more good than harm. An individual’s blood pressure depends on the complex interplay of heart and blood vessels and understanding this relation is the key to understanding the pathophysiology of hypertension.
NORMAL CARDIAC AND VASCULAR PHYSIOLOGY
Relation between mean pressure and mean flow in the human circulation
The role of the circulation is to deliver blood to the tissues and flow occurs because of the pressure difference established by the pumping action of the heart. The relation between the pressure difference and flow can be described by a relation that is analogous to Ohm’s Law for electrical current (box 1) and sometimes termed Darcy’s Law.
(where ΔP = pressure difference. Q = bulk flow, R = resistance)
This relation can be restated for the whole circulation in terms of mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and peripheral resistance (box 2).
(where MAP = mean arterial pressure, CO = cardiac output (= stroke volume × heart rate), PVR = total peripheral vascular resistance)
Although a simplification, this emphasises that an elevation of mean blood pressure can only come about as a result of an increase in cardiac output (CO), an increase in total peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), or a combination of both.
CO is a consequence of left ventricular pump function, which in turn depends on a number of factors (fig 1) including preload (venous return or left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV)), the contractile state of the ventricular muscle, and afterload, an ill defined concept that is often equated with PVR in vivo, but is better characterised as the aortic input impedance,w2 namely the complex relation between unsteady flow and pressure throughout the cardiac cycle.
PVR is dominated by small muscular arteries and arterioles (vessels with diameters between 30–300 μm).w3 Flow through an individual artery can be described by the Hagen-Poiseuille’s equation (box 3).
(where Q = flow, η = fluid viscosity, L = vessel length, r = vessel radius)
So small changes in arterial diameter (or radius) have a profound effect on flow (or resistance). In the short term, the diameter of small arteries and arterioles is controlled by the contractile state of their smooth muscle. This in turn is regulated by a host of local and systemic factors (fig 1).
Pulsatile pressure and flow in the circulation
The discussion above assumes that pressure and flow in the circulation are steady. This is clearly not the case. Cardiac output depends on the dynamic interaction between the mechanics of ejection and the properties of the vasculature. Pressure and flow show cyclical changes at all sites in the circulation, although the changes are considerably damped in capillaries.3 This damping is due mainly to the elastic behaviour of large elastic arteries, such as the aorta. and is termed the Windkessel or cushioning function (fig 2): in effect some of the pressure energy generated by the left ventricle is converted to elastic energy through distending large arteries. Once the heart ceases ejection and pressure falls, the walls of these arteries recoil and the elastic energy is reconverted into pressure. This reduces the magnitude of pressure change and accounts (to a large extent) for the diastolic component of arterial pressure.
Although this model is an oversimplification, it emphasises that arterial compliance (stiffness or elastance is the reciprocal of compliance) is an important factor in damping pressure oscillation and that pulse pressure will increase when arteries stiffen (for example, with aging). Moreover it also makes clear that changes in arterial stiffness per se should affect pulse pressure and not mean pressure.4w4
More detailed examination of the arterial pressure waveform in different segments of the arterial tree shows that it undergoes complex changes in shape5 that cannot be explained by the Windkessel model. Perhaps most surprising is that there is a consistent rise in systolic pressure (but not mean pressure) in a peripheral artery such as the tibial artery or the brachial artery compared with the aorta. Generally this augmentation of systolic pressure is small (~7 mm Hg) and tends to diminish with age. But during exercise or in some young individuals at rest the difference between brachial and aortic pressures can exceed 30 mm Hg. In the latter case this may give rise to spurious diagnoses of hypertension.w5 This augmentation is believed to be caused by reflection of pressure waves. Reflected pressure waves are clinically important since they may place an additional load on the heart and vasculature (for example, in hypertension or heart failure). When the heart contracts it emits a forward travelling wave of pressure (technically termed a forward compression wave as it is a “blowing” as opposed to a “sucking” wave).6 This pressure wave travels rapidly through the circulation at speeds of ~10 m/s and is responsible for the palpable pulse. The speed of propagation of this pressure wave is much faster (> 10 times) than the velocity of blood flow and is related to the stiffness of the blood vessel.3 Much as sound waves may be reflected as echoes, pressure waves can be reflected. This happens at sites (for example, branches or tapering) where vessel diameter and/or stiffness (impedance) changes. Reflected pressure waves travel back towards the heart augmenting the forward pressure wave and reducing the forward flow of blood.
In the aorta wave reflection is responsible for the late systolic augmentation of pressure that is often seen in elderly individuals and may impose an additional load on the heart and impair coronary blood flow. The contribution of reflected waves is often estimated non-invasively by measuring the augmentation index (the proportional rise in late systolic pressure) either from the pressure waveform measured in the carotid artery7w6 or after mathematical transformation of the radial artery waveform.w7 The pattern of pressure augmentation in a particular artery depends on the distance to downstream reflection sites and speed of wave travel. Differences in these account for the complex changes in the early systolic component of the pressure waveform at different sites.
A different sort of pressure wave is evident at the end of systole—a forward travelling expansion wave. This is effectively a wave of suction generated by the left ventricle. This comes about when active myocardial shortening stops, but the aortic valve is still open. For a short period aortic blood flow continues under its own momentumw8 and left ventricular pressure declines giving rise to the expansion wave.w9 This phase corresponds to the period of protodiastole described by Wiggers.w10 The expansion wave slows the flow of blood from the heart and leads to closure of the aortic valves (valve closure is also accelerated by formation of vortices behind the valve leaflets during flow deceleration.w11
HAEMODYNAMICS OF HYPERTENSION
Patients with hypertension of several years standing (but without target organ damage) have increased PVR (box 4).8 The increase in PVR is present in all vascular territories (for example, renal, splanchnic, skeletal muscle, coronary, and pulmonary). Cardiac index and stroke volume are generally normal or reduced, although heart rate may be higher than in normals.8 Following exercise the increased PVR is even more evident and cardiac output is typically reduced, largely because of a failure of stroke volume (SV) to increase in response to exercise. Nevertheless, despite the normal cardiac index, modelling studies suggest that abnormal cardiac performance contributes significantly to elevated blood pressure in established hypertension, particularly in subjects with concentric hypertrophy of the heart.w4
Box 4 Haemodynamic changes in established essential hypertension
↑ central shift in blood volume
→ cardiac index, stroke volume, extracellular fluid volume
In established hypertension there is also a reduction in arterial compliance and a central shift in blood volume, which may be secondary to reduced venous compliance. However, blood volume and extracellular fluid volume are generally found to be normal.
HAEMODYNAMICS OF EARLY HYPERTENSION OR PRE-HYPERTENSIVE STATES
While the basic haemodynamics of established hypertension are undisputed, there is less agreement about the haemodynamic pattern in young individuals with (comparatively) elevated blood pressures. Since an individual’s position within the overall blood pressure distribution tends to remain fairly constant (tracking of blood pressures) these subjects are at high risk of developing hypertension in later life.
In young individuals less than 19 years, most evidence suggests that subjects with the highest blood pressure have increased PVR, though small increases in cardiac index have been seen in some studies.w12 w13 There is evidence that young individuals with hypertension have an increased sympathetic activity, though studies in established hypertension are inconclusive.8 The question is complicated by methodological difficulties in the assessment of sympathetic nerve activity in vivo and the importance of increased sympathetic activity in the development of hypertension is uncertain. Interestingly, an increased left ventricular mass is a fairly consistent finding in young individuals with raised blood pressure8 and is also seen in offspring of hypertensives,w14 although the functional determinants of this abnormality are not well understood.
In adults (18–40 years) with raised blood pressure (borderline or mild hypertension) PVR is often in the normal range at rest, and the raised blood pressure is attributable to increased cardiac index and heart rate. A prospective study of young males8 reported that subjects with high cardiac index/normal total peripheral resistance index pattern changed to a low cardiac index/high resistance pattern at 10 and 20 year follow up; it is therefore plausible that haemodynamic patterns in young individuals with high blood pressure undergo this type of change as they age, accounting for the appearance of the high PVR pattern in established hypertension.
Structural changes in hypertension
Both heart and arteries adapt their structure in response to altered load. This occurs physiologically (for example, during somatic growth) and pathologically in hypertension. Increased pressure exerts an increased load on a thin walled chamber or tube by increasing wall tension according to Laplace’s law (fig 3).
More complex expressions for wall tension in the heart or blood vessels exist, but this is a reasonable approximation. A rise in tension results in increased wall tensile stress. Normalisation of wall tensile stress can be achieved either by an increase in wall thickness or by a reduction in chamber/lumen diameter, or both.
Cardiac remodelling in hypertension and its functional consequences
Cardiac structure is influenced by pressure and volume loads.9 In hypertension changes in left ventricular structure occur in response to the increased pressure load and represent an attempt by the heart to normalise myocardial wall stress. The increased pressure load in hypertension is primarily caused by the increased resistance, although reduced compliance and possibly altered magnitude and timing of reflected pressure waves make a contribution.
Patterns of remodelling: relation to load
Hypertension is associated with a spectrum of structural change in the left ventricle.w15 The pattern of change may reflect differences between individuals in terms of age, haemodynamics, 24 hour blood pressure profile, arterial stiffness, plasma volume, myocardial performance, neurohormonal status or genetic influences.10w15 Hypertensive changes can be classified as showing hypertrophy (an increase in left ventricular mass) or remodelling (normal left ventricular mass, abnormal relative wall thickness) (fig 4).
Remodelling is seen in normal aging without hypertensionw16 and is probably an adaptation to preserve ejection fraction despite reduced midwall fibre function. It has become apparent that myocardial fibre shortening is reduced in human hypertension. Early clinical investigations assessed cardiac function using endocardial measurements. Recently, it has been appreciated that there is a discrepancy between shortening measured at the endocardium and at the midwall. Midwall shortening is commonly reduced in left ventricular hypertrophy and the process of wall hypertrophy allows total wall shortening to remain normal in spite of a depression in fibre shortening—that is, the change in left ventricular geometry allows the chamber function to remain normal.11
Normal myocardium contains an interstitial fibrous network upon which the myocytes are arranged. Although hypertrophy primarily involves myocytes, the interstitial network also changes. This occurs initially in a perivascular distribution but progressively extends to cause a widespread interstitial fibrosis. In addition, replacement fibrosis may occur to replace necrotic or apoptotic myocytes. Increased interstitial fibrous tissue is probably important in cardiac dysfunction in hypertension, but the amount of fibrosis is not easy to measure clinically and so differential changes in myocyte hypertrophy and fibrosis cannot easily be assessed in patients.
Most hypertensives have normal left ventricular structure, but left ventricular hypertrophy predicts a poor prognosis, the almost threefold increased risk being independent of the blood pressure level.12 Whether individual remodelling patterns confer additional risk is disputed (Framingham study) and how left ventricular hypertrophy causes increased risk is uncertain. The increase in ventricular arrhythmias13 and increased QT duration and QT dispersion seen in left ventricular hypertrophy14 may account for the increased risk of sudden death, but other mechanisms such as impaired coronary perfusion could also be important. The electrical abnormalities are likely to be caused by heterogeneous conduction in the ventricle due to increased interstitial fibrosis. There is now increasing evidence that regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with antihypertensive treatment provides cardiovascular protection over and above the reduction in blood pressure levels,15w17 but again the mechanism of the risk reduction is uncertain.
Consequences of hypertrophy and remodelling
Active relaxation is impaired in hypertrophy and remodelling.w18 The explanation for this is uncertain, although changes in intracellular calcium handling, ion exchangers, and ion channels are implicated.w19 Cardiac hypertrophy is also associated with impaired coronary reserve. This may be caused by a number of mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction, narrowing of small arteries, microvascular rarefaction, perivascular fibrosis, altered wall mechanics, and relative myocyte hypertrophy.w20 A diminished coronary reserve will lead to myocardial ischaemia in the absence of epicardial coronary disease and may further impair relaxation.
Impaired relaxation results in prolongation of isovolumic relaxation time (from aortic valve closure to mitral valve opening) because it takes longer for left ventricular pressure to decrease below atrial pressure. Once the mitral valve is open the slowed relaxation means that left ventricular filling takes longer and there is more blood in the left atrium by the end of the early filling period. This leads to an increased force of atrial contraction. Echo Doppler studies therefore show an early filling wave (E wave), that has a reduced peak velocity and a prolonged duration (fig 5B) and an increase in the A wave, resulting in a reduced E/A ratio. As diastolic dysfunction progresses there is a decrease in left ventricular compliance caused mainly by the increased interstitial fibrosis. This impairs filling notably. As the heart becomes stiffer, pressure in all the chambers increases. The increased left atrial pressure results in a large pressure gradient in early diastole when the mitral valve first opens, so the peak velocity of the early filling wave is very high. But the reduced ventricular compliance means that pressure increases disproportionately for small changes in volume, so once left ventricular filling begins atrial and ventricular pressures equalise very quickly, resulting in a very short duration early filling wave (fig 5C).
Mild diastolic dysfunction is often clinically silent; however, if the deterioration of diastolic function is sufficient to significantly reduce ventricular filling and left ventricular end diastolic volume, a reduction in stroke volume will occur and patients may develop low output symptoms such as fatigue. As diastolic dysfunction progresses, left ventricular filling pressures become abnormally high and pulmonary congestion may occur.w21 Thus the symptoms of heart failure may develop in the presence of apparently normal systolic function. Early studies have suggested that over a third of patients with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure have normal left ventricular systolic functionw22; however, it is now becoming apparent that there is considerable overlap between diastolic and systolic dysfunction.16 Therefore it is not surprising that diastolic dysfunction associated with symptoms carries an adverse prognosis.17
Arterial remodelling in hypertension and its functional consequences
Structural changes in hypertensive vasculature show similarities to those in the heart. In both cases the primary goal appears to be the normalisation of wall stress. The elevated pressure causes an increase in wall tension that is largely experienced by vascular myocytes and the extracellular matrix of the blood vessel. The pattern of remodelling of the vasculature seems highly dependent on the size and function of the artery examined. In part this may reflect the major influence of flow on arterial structure.18 Flow affects arteries via the frictional force experienced by the wall as a result of the flow of blood (shear stress). The wall shear stress is sensed by the endothelial cells. In response to shear stress the endothelium releases a number of vasoactive factors that affect arterial tone and growth.
Cardiac and vascular pathology in hypertension: key points
Increased peripheral vascular resistance (PVR) is the hallmark of established hypertension, but altered cardiac function also probably contributes to the raised blood pressure
Large elastic arteries are important in damping the pulsatile flow created by the heart
Pressure wave reflection from downstream affects the pressure waveform in arteries and this is responsible for raised brachial systolic blood pressure compared with central aortic systolic pressure
Deceleration of left ventricular contraction causes an expansion (suction) wave, which is responsible for aortic valve closure
Hypertension causes cardiac and vascular remodelling and hypertrophy. This helps to normalise left ventricular and arterial wall stress and may compensate for a reduction in myocardial fibre function to preserve cardiac output
Hypertensive vessels are not inherently stiffer than normal blood vessels. All vessels become stiffer as they are distended and the increased stiffness in hypertension is a reflection of this
Hypertension is associated with reduced vasodilator reserve and a reduction in microvascular density
Large elastic and muscular arteries
These arteries do not contribute to peripheral vascular resistance, but influence total arterial compliance and wave reflection. The diameter of large elastic arteries such as the aorta or carotid is increased in hypertension. There is also an increase in wall thickness (or at least intima–media thickness (IMT) as measured by ultrasound).19 The increase in diameter in these vessels is probably passive; the rise in pressure distends the vessel, while the increased media thickness normalises media stress. In smaller more muscular large arteries, such as the femoral, brachial, and radial, arterial diameter is not increased, although IMT is increased and wall:lumen ratio is therefore increased.
Numerous studies have reported that arterial stiffness is increased in hypertension. With the possible exception of the carotid artery of young hypertensives,w23 this increase in stiffness is not caused by a change in the inherent wall properties of arteries (despite the increase in wall thickness) but is a result of the increased distending pressure. Blood vessels do not obey Hooke’s law and are non-linearly elastic—that is, they become stiffer when distended. When this is taken into account, the intrinsic elasticity of hypertensive arteries does not usually differ from normotensive arteries.w24 Indeed, radial artery stiffness has been reported to be decreased compared with normal when pressure effects are allowed for.w25 Interestingly, these recent findings conflict with the widely held view that hypertensive changes in arterial compliance are essentially an acceleration of the aging process. Aging results in increased arterial stiffness probably through degenerative changes in elastin in the arterial wall. In contrast hypertension does not affect the elastic nature of the arterial wall, although the pressure induced increase in stiffness will worsen age related decreases in arterial compliance. A consequence of the increased arterial stiffness in hypertension is that speed of pressure wave travel will be increased (this is often used as a measure of arterial stiffness). It is also likely that changes between one artery and another (impedance mismatching) result in increased wave reflection and increased pressure augmentation as discussed above.
Small muscular resistance arteries, arterioles, and the microvasculature
The lumen diameter as a ratio of wall thickness is reduced in small arteries in all forms of hypertension. In essential hypertension this is caused by inward eutrophic remodelling (fig 4),20 whereas in some secondary forms of hypertension hypertrophic changes are seen.w26 This remodelling has a number of consequences beyond normalising media stress. Maximum vasodilation (minimum resistance) is reduced; this results in a reduced vasodilator reserve (most significant in the coronary circulation) and vasomotor responses are enhanced, as a given shortening will induce an exaggerated vasoconstriction.21 This effect has been termed the vascular amplifierw27 and is suggested as a mechanism by which the circulation can chronically maintain elevated resistance without excessive vasoconstriction.
Relatively little is known about arteriolar changes in human hypertension. On the basis of animal studies it has been suggested that arteriolar tone may be increased, but there is little evidence for structural changes in individual arterioles except in accelerated or malignant hypertension. In contrast there is good evidence that the density of the microvasculature is reduced. This can be visualised in a number sites including the retina, sclera, and skin. There is doubt about whether the reduction in microvascular density is “functional” (non-perfused vessels) or structural (obliterated vessels). In our view this is an academic question and in any case it is likely that persistently non-perfused vessels are ultimately obliterated.w28 The consequence of this pruning of the microvascular tree is that resistance is increased (by up to 40% in some estimatesw27) and that maximum tissue perfusion (and consequently nutrient supply) is restricted. This could contribute to the association between hypertension and diabetes (or insulin resistance) as capillary rarefaction in hypertension may result in impaired glucose extraction by skeletal muscle.w29
Hypertension is a disorder of heart and blood vessels. It is a mistake to view these two components in isolation. Abnormalities in arterio–ventricular interaction have been neglected in hypertension research until recently, but may be of critical importance in understanding the development and consequences of this condition.