Mechanism of improvement in exercise capacity after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery
- S Yuda1,
- S Nakatani1,
- Y Kosakai2,
- T Satoh1,
- Y Goto1,
- M Yamagishi1,
- K Bando2,
- S Kitamura2,
- K Miyatake1
- 1Divisions of Cardiology, National Cardiovascular Centre, Osaka, Japan
- 2Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cardiovascular Centre, Osaka, Japan
- Correspondence to:
Dr S Nakatani
Division of Cardiology, National Cardiovascular Centre, 5-7-1 Fujishiro-dai, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan;
- Accepted 4 July 2003
Objective: To clarify the mechanism of improvement in exercise capacity after the maze procedure.
Design: Retrospective study.
Setting: Tertiary referral centre.
Patients: 26 patients (mean (SD) age 57 (9) years) with atrial fibrillation (AF) and mitral valve disease were studied with echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery. Of these, eight had persistent AF and 18 had restored sinus rhythm (SR) by the surgery. Six patients (mean (SD) age 59 (12) years) with AF undergoing mitral valve surgery without the maze procedure who had cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after the surgery formed the control group.
Main outcome measures: Echocardiographic parameters of atrial function were measured from transmitral flow recordings. Peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2) and the slope of the relation between V̇o2 and workload (ratio of ΔV̇o2 to Δ work) were determined as indices of exercise capacity.
Results: The degree of improvements in peak V̇o2 and the ratio of ΔV̇o2 to Δ work after the mitral valve surgery was comparable between the maze and control group. It was also comparable between patients with and those without successfully restored SR after the maze procedure. The degree of the increase in peak V̇o2 correlated with the change in left atrial diameter (r = −0.40, p = 0.047) but atrial contraction did not correlate with the increase.
Conclusions: Improvement in exercise capacity may not be caused by restored SR and atrial contraction but may at least partly relate to the reduction of left atrial size and improvement of haemodynamic variables by the surgery.
Improved postoperative exercise capacity in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery has been reported to depend on several factors such as sex, preoperative functional status, persistence of pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular function, physical training, and improvement in ventilatory function.1–7 Skeletal muscle structure and metabolism have also been shown to be associated with exercise capacity in patients with mitral stenosis who have undergone balloon mitral valvoplasty.8,9 Although postoperative rhythm is expected to have an important role in the recovery of exercise capacity, surprisingly little data are available about this issue. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia and is well known to impair the exercise capacity of patients with mitral valve disease.10 However, there has been only limited information regarding the effect of AF or the effect of restored sinus rhythm (SR) on the degree of postoperative improvement in exercise capacity after mitral valve surgery.3,11
The maze procedure, originally developed by Cox and colleagues12 and later modified by Kosakai and colleagues,13 has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for refractory AF associated with mitral valve disease.13–15 We have recently shown that the restored SR and atrial contraction were maintained for a long time in patients with mitral valve disease.16 The exercise capacity of patients with17,18 and without19 organic heart disease who underwent the maze procedure has been reported to improve in the late phase. However, most patients in previous studies recovered from AF and no reports have focused on the exercise capacity of patients with persistent AF after the maze procedure. Thus, it is unknown to what extent this improvement is related to restored SR and atrial contraction after the procedure. In the present study, we sought to clarify the mechanism of improvement in exercise capacity after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery.
Sixty six patients had received cardiac surgery with the maze procedure and cardiopulmonary exercise testing before (< 6 months) the surgery between July 1992 and May 1996. Of these, 37 patients who had no cardiopulmonary exercise testing after the surgery were excluded. Further, we excluded three patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing during the early postoperative phase (< 6 months) because we considered only exercise capacity that improved late after maze surgery.17 The remaining 26 patients formed the maze group. All patients in the maze group had mitral valve diseases and chronic AF defined as AF lasting > 6 months (mean (SD) duration 7.6 (7.2) years, range 0.5–30 years). Eighteen patients had SR at the time of follow up cardiopulmonary exercise testing (maze-SR group: 10 men, age 59 (8) years, range 37–69 years) and eight patients had persistent AF (maze-AF group: five men, mean (SD) age 54 (9) years, range 46–72 years) after the surgery. Seven patients had mitral stenosis, eight had mitral regurgitation, nine had both mitral stenosis and regurgitation, and two had prosthetic mitral valve failure. The modified maze procedure was performed simultaneously with mitral valve surgery (n = 26), aortic valve surgery (n = 9), tricuspid annuloplasty (n = 9), and left atrial (LA) plication (n = 1). Age, mitral valve disease, additional procedure, New York Heart Association functional class, and preoperative and postoperative medication were not significantly different between the maze-SR and maze-AF groups, but the duration of AF was significantly longer in the maze-AF group. The New York Heart Association functional class in patients undergoing the maze procedure improved significantly after the surgery (table 1). Only one patient underwent programmed rehabilitation after the surgery.
During the same time period, six patients (three men, mean age 59 (12) years, range 44–73 years) with AF had cardiopulmonary exercise testing before and after the surgery without maze procedure and they served as the control group. The duration of AF in the control group was significantly longer than that in the maze group (table 1).
We have modified the maze procedure originated by Cox and colleagues.12 Details of the procedure we performed have been previously reported.13 The major modifications are changes in atriotomy lines, aimed at preserving the sinus node arteries, and use of cryoablation instead of atriotomy and reanastomosis to simplify the procedure. Other modifications are transection of the superior vena cava and detachment of the left ventricle at the circumferential left atriotomy around the pulmonary veins to improve exposure and manipulation of the mitral valve.
A standard 12 lead ECG was recorded from all patients at their regular visit to our hospital, which was a month after discharge, and the cardiac rhythm was determined.
Ultrasound examinations were performed with a commercially available ultrasound system (SSD 870, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan; SSH-160A, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan; or SONOS 2000, Hewlett Packard, Andover, Massachusetts, USA) with a 2.5 MHz imaging transducer before (mean (SD) 1.7 (2.5) months) and after (16.8 (13.4) months) the surgery. LA diameter and left ventricular (LV) end diastolic and end systolic diameters were determined from M mode or B mode echocardiogram and LV fractional shortening was obtained.
Transmitral flow velocity was measured with pulsed Doppler echocardiography by positioning a sample volume at the level of the mitral tip in the apical four chamber view and was recorded on a strip chart at a paper speed of 100 mm/s. Peak velocity and the time–velocity integral of the late filling wave (A wave) were determined.16,20 When the deceleration line of the early filling wave did not reach the baseline, the time–velocity integral of the A wave was measured as an area above the extrapolation line of early filling wave deceleration. The atrial filling fraction was derived as the ratio of the time–velocity integral of the A wave to that of total diastolic filling. Each measurement was obtained as an average of 6–8 consecutive beats. We arbitrarily considered an A wave peak velocity ⩾ 10 cm/s to be echocardiographic evidence of effective atrial contraction.16,20 The right ventriculoatrial peak pressure gradient was calculated by applying the simplified Bernoulli equation to the tricuspid regurgitation velocity measured by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography. We considered a peak pressure gradient > 25 mm Hg to indicate pulmonary hypertension.21 Data were analysed by a person (SY) blinded to all clinical and patient information.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing on an upright bicycle ergometer before (2.6 (2.6) months) and after (16.3 (9.3) months) surgery. They first pedalled at 55 rpm with no added load for one minute. The work rate was then increased by 15 W/min up to the patient’s symptom limited maximum exercise level. Breath by breath gas was analysed with an AE-280 spiroergometer (Minato Medical Science Co, Osaka, Japan) connected to a personal computer running analysing software. Peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2) was determined as the value of the averaged data during the final 15 s of exercise. The ratio of change in V̇O2 to change in work rate (ratio of ΔV̇O2 to Δ work) was calculated as the slope of V̇O2 per unit workload from one minute after the start of load addition until 85% maximum V̇O2.22 During the exercise test, heart rate was continuously monitored and blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer every minute.
All data are expressed as mean (SD). Continuous variables were compared with Student’s paired or unpaired t test as appropriate and the three groups were compared by analysis of variance with the Scheffé post hoc test. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the correlation between the change in peak V̇O2 or ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio and echocardiographic parameters. Categorical variables were analysed with the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test was used when appropriate. We considered results significant when p < 0.05.
In the maze group, SR was noted in 17 of the 26 patients (65%) on ECG one month after surgery. In the remaining nine patients, SR was restored in one patient two months after surgery and AF persisted in eight (31%). Once SR was restored no patient reverted to AF. No patient in the control group had restored SR after surgery.
LA diameter in the maze-SR group and LV end diastolic diameter in the maze-AF group decreased significantly after the surgery. Right ventriculoatrial peak pressure gradient in the control group and the incidence of tricuspid regurgitation in the maze-SR group decreased significantly after the surgery. LV fractional shortening and LA and LV end diastolic diameters did not differ between the maze-AF and maze-SR groups both before and after the surgery (table 2).
Three patients had residual severe mitral regurgitation and two had residual severe tricuspid regurgitation. No patients had significant obstructive prosthetic mitral valve failure (3.4 (0.3) mm Hg for peak diastolic pressure gradient and 1.4 (0.8) mm Hg for mean diastolic pressure gradient) after the surgery. Ten patients (56%) in the maze-SR group had effective atrial contraction, as shown by a restored Doppler transmitral A wave (⩾ 10 cm/s). The mean A wave peak velocities, time–velocity integrals, and atrial filling fractions were 51 (23) cm/s, 4 (2) cm, and 15 (4)%, respectively.
Exercise testing parameters
The mean time intervals from the surgery to cardiopulmonary exercise testing did not differ between the maze-SR, maze-AF, and control groups (14.6 (6.6) v 19.1 (9.3) v 17.4 (15.5) months, respectively, p = 0.48). Maximum work load was similar in the three groups before and after surgery but increased significantly after surgery in the maze-SR group. Heart rate at rest before and after surgery and peak heart rate before surgery did not differ between the three groups, but peak heart rate in the maze-SR group decreased significantly after surgery. Systolic blood pressure at rest and peak in the maze-SR group and that at peak in the maze-AF group increased significantly after the surgery. Maximum work load, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure at rest or peak did not differ between the maze-AF and maze-SR groups both before and after surgery, except for the peak heart rate (table 2).
Peak V̇O2 did not differ between the three groups before surgery and it increased similarly in all groups (33.1 (46.1)% v 15.6 (25.2)% v 22.1 (17.8)% for the maze-AF, maze-SR, and control group, respectively, p = 0.54) (fig 1, left panel). ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio also did not differ between the three groups before surgery. It also increased in the all groups after the surgery (fig 1, right panel).
Since the surgical procedure itself may influence exercise capacity, we determined it by the procedure. In the maze group, peak V̇O2 in patients with mitral valve replacement (n = 12) increased significantly after surgery (from 17.5 (4.1) ml/kg/min to 21.3 (4.7) ml/kg/min, p = 0.023) but not in those with mitral valve repair (n = 12, from 18.6 (4.9) ml/kg/min to 20.2 (5.7) ml/kg/min, p = 0.19). Further, no significant increase was found in patients with residual severe mitral or tricuspid regurgitation after surgery (from 17.0 (4.3) ml/kg/min to 17.7 (3.2) ml/kg/min, p = 0.70).
Of the 18 patients with restored SR, peak V̇O2 (21.9 (6.0) v 18.7 (3.6) ml/kg/min, p = 0.20) and ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio (7.6 (1.3) v 7.8 (1.1) ml/kg/min/W, p = 0.73) were not significantly different between patients with (n = 10) and those without (n = 8) effective atrial contraction after the surgery. Further, A wave peak velocities, time–velocity integrals, and atrial filling fractions did not correlate with increase in peak V̇O2 (p = 0.50, p = 0.17, and p = 0.27, respectively) and ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio (p = 0.78, p = 0.65, and p = 0.90, respectively).
In the maze group, a decrease in LA diameter induced by the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery was significantly correlated with increase in peak V̇O2 (r = −0.40, p = 0.047) (fig 2) and tended to correlate with increase in ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio (r = −0.39, p = 0.059). However, age, duration of AF, and differences in peak heart rate, LV fractional shortening, LV end diastolic diameter, and right ventriculoatrial peak pressure gradient caused by the surgery did not correlate with increases in peak V̇O2 or ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio.
We assessed the exercise capacity of patients who underwent mitral valve surgery with and without the maze procedure. Improvement in exercise capacity after the surgery was comparable between the maze and control group. It was also comparable between patients with and those without successfully restored SR after the maze procedure. The increase in peak V̇O2 correlated not with the postoperative restored atrial function but with the reduction of LA diameter. Reduction of LA size, not restored SR and atrial contraction, may be an important factor influencing exercise capacity after mitral valve surgery.
Comparison with previous studies
We found that improved peak V̇O2 after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery agreed with previous studies.17,18 The ΔV̇O2 to Δ work ratio, which indicates oxygen transport to the working muscles and has been considered to reflect cardiac output,22 also increased after surgery, as in a previous study.17 One of the limitations of those previous studies17,18 may be the lack of a control group (that is, patients with AF undergoing mitral valve surgery without the maze procedure). We found that the improvement in exercise capacity after mitral valve surgery was comparable between the group with and that without the maze procedure. Furthermore, residual mitral or tricuspid regurgitation was identified as a factor influencing exercise capacity after surgery.
The importance of restored SR and atrial contraction in the exercise capacity after mitral valve surgery has not been defined clearly. Triposkiadis and colleagues3 found a greater improvement in exercise capacity following mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis in patients with SR than in those with AF. Tamai and colleagues11 found that exercise capacity following both balloon mitral valvoplasty and cardioversion for mitral stenosis increased significantly in patients with restored SR but not in those with persistent AF. Further, they have shown a significant correlation between the degree of improvement in peak V̇O2 and restored atrial function.11 In contrast, Deneke and colleagues23 showed in a randomised study that exercise capacity was not different between patients with mitral valve replacement combined with the maze procedure in which radiofrequency ablation was used and those with mitral valve replacement alone, which is consistent with our findings. The inconsistent findings may be explained by differences in the patients’ characteristics such as mitral stenosis or regurgitation and depressed atrial function after the maze procedure.16
Restored SR and atrial contraction by the maze procedure seemed not to play such an important part in exercise capacity. However, we found that maximal work load increased significantly only in patients with restored SR and not in patients with persistent AF. This interesting finding, indicating a better working capacity or exercise tolerance in these patients though not documented by V̇O2, has been also observed in a previous study.23 A significant decrease of peak heart rate was also found only in patients with restored SR after surgery. Thus, restored SR may be advantageous in achieving a larger maximum work load at a lower heart rate.
Mechanism of improvement in exercise capacity
Although previous studies17,18 have shown improved exercise capacity after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery, the precise mechanism has not been well elucidated. Several possible mechanisms may account for that finding. Firstly, the reduction in pulmonary venous pressures at rest and during exercise after mitral valve surgery has been known2 and it may contribute to the improvement in exercise capacity by decreasing lung interstitial fluid accumulation and lung compliance. Triposkiadis and colleagues3 found a significant relation between peak V̇O2 after mitral valve replacement and the ratio of right ventricular acceleration to ejection time, an index of mean pulmonary artery pressure.24 Secondly, Tanabe and associates25,26 showed a decrease in excessive exercise ventilation due to reduced physiological dead space after balloon mitral valvoplasty and an association with improved exercise capacity. Further, this ventilatory improvement has been related to the amelioration of post-exercise exertional dyspnoea after balloon mitral valvoplasty.27 The relation also has been observed after mitral valve surgery.7 Thus, the decrease in excessive exercise ventilation, which was not assessed in this study, leads to an increase in physical activity through relief of exertional dyspnoea and consequently may improve exercise capacity. We speculate that, although restoration of SR by the maze procedure is advantageous, it may not equal the dramatically improved haemodynamic2 and ventilatory function7,26 after mitral valve surgery. The fact that exercise capacity of patients with residual valve regurgitation did not improve significantly may support this speculation.
We found a significant relation between improved peak V̇O2 and reduced LA diameter. A similar finding has been reported following mitral valve replacement for mitral stenosis.4 The reduction of LA diameter after mitral valve surgery may lead to improved respiratory function by decreasing bronchopulmonary compression, as is seen after the LA plication procedure in patients with giant LA.28 Another possible explanation is that a reduced LA diameter has the potential to reduce LA wall tension and increase LA contractility, as in the LV after partial LV ventriculectomy.29 Augmentation of LA contractility may facilitate a reduction of pulmonary artery pressure and improvement in right ventricular function. However, the precise mechanism underlying this relation has been unclear.
This study was retrospective and had several limitations. Firstly, the small number of patients in each subgroup limited the power of the conclusions. Secondly, the cardiopulmonary exercise test and ultrasound examination were not performed on the same day. Thirdly, although the proportion of mitral valve disease was similar in the three groups, various mitral valve diseases were present. Consequently, large prospective studies will be necessary to determine whether the maze procedure contributes to an improvement in exercise capacity in patients with uniform mitral valve disease (for example, pure mitral stenosis or pure mitral regurgitation). Lastly, because we had no additional pulmonary vein flow data and LA volume measurements, quantification of LA systolic function was not feasible. Thus, the possibility of LA systolic dysfunction in the patients with successfully restored SR after the maze procedure cannot be excluded. The absence of invasive pulmonary pressure measurement was also a problem.
Conclusions and clinical implications
Our findings suggest that improvement in exercise capacity after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery may not be caused by restored SR and atrial contraction but may be at least partly related to the reduction of LA size. Regarding the improvement in exercise capacity in patients with mitral valve disease, the advantage of restoration of SR by the maze procedure, which has been observed in patients with lone AF,19 may not be clear due to the dramatic changes in haemodynamic factors2 and ventilatory function7,26 after mitral valve surgery. However, the regularised rhythm and adequate sinoatrial conduction with restored atrial function after the maze procedure may contribute to an increase in quality of life30 and a larger maximum work load.23
LA dimension after the maze procedure has been known to decrease significantly and did not change during the follow up period.15,16,20 We speculate that extensive suturing of the LA wall may contribute to the reduction of chamber size and prevent LA redilatation after the maze procedure. Kawaguchi and colleagues31 reported a favourable effect of reduced LA size on restoration of SR after the maze procedure. Reduced LA size combined with the maze procedure has been shown to diminish blood stasis in the LA32 and may reduce the incidence of stroke after the maze procedure, which has been reported recently.33 Prospective studies should be planned to investigate the effectiveness of reduced LA size in restoring SR and preventing thromboembolism after the maze procedure.
This study was supported in part by a Research Grant for Cardiovascular Diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, Tokyo, Japan. This study was presented in part at the 48th annual scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 1999.
Dr Yuda is now at the Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sapporo Medical University of School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan. Dr Kosakai is now at Takarazuka Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan