Responses
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 23 November 2015
- Published on: 23 November 2015
- Published on: 23 November 2015
- Published on: 23 November 2015Platelet Activation and catheter intracoronary brachytherapyShow More
Dear Editor
We read with great interest the article by Jaster et al. [1] dealing with the failure by aspirin and clopidogrel to inhibit platelet activation during vascular brachytherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention, which is responsible for a higher risk of stent thrombosis. With respect to the above, we would like to inform about some findings dealing with this issue.
Platelet aggre...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 23 November 2015Authors' reply: Platelet activation after VBTShow More
Dear Editor
We agree with the opinion of Krötz et al. that endothelial mediated or train source associated effects but not the irradiation itself lead to an increased platelet activation after VBT as pointed out by our publication.[1]
In contrast to the paper of Krötz et al,[2] in which only relative changes in platelet activation are shown, our data were given as the percentages of act...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared. - Published on: 23 November 2015Platelet activation associated with intracoronary brachytherapyShow More
Dear Editor
In the manuscript "Catheter based intracoronary brachytherapy leads to increased platelet activation" the authors observe an increased platelet activation as assessed by the activation markers CD63 (content of platelet lysosomes) and thrombospondin (content of platelet a-granules) immediately following intracoronary intervention. This occurred only when patients had received catheter-based irradiation...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.