In this rare case, a patient had an anomalous right coronary artery originating from the left sinus of Valsalva coursing between the great vessels. He presented with symptoms and computed tomograms suggestive of an acute aortic dissection.
- acute aortic dissection
- coronary artery anomalies
- CAA, coronary artery anomalies
- CT, computed tomography
- TOE, transoesophageal echocardiography
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Coronary artery anomalies (CAA) are difficult to diagnose on clinical grounds. According to the literature, the incidence of CAA is reported to be between 0.46–1.55% in the general population.1 The clinical presentations and functional importance of CAA vary widely. On the one extreme, they may be clinically silent, discovered by chance and considered only to be curiosities; on the other extreme, they may cause angina pectoris, syncope, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and even sudden cardiac death. Significant morbidity and mortality can result, even among young adults. The reason for the sudden fatal events is generally unclear but probably relates to the anatomical variants and proximal course of the coronary anomaly. In particular, anomalies that involve the proximal coronary artery segments coursing between the aorta and the pulmonary trunk have been reported to be potentially lethal.2
We describe, for the first time in the literature, a patient with an anomalous coronary artery with an aberrant course between the great vessels misdiagnosed as being an acute aortic dissection on the basis of the clinical presentation and computed tomography (CT).
A 43 year old man with a history of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia presented to the emergency room of our hospital for sudden tearing pain in his left arm radiating to the back that began after he competed in an athletic event. His blood pressure was 145/70 mm Hg. His ECG pattern and cardiac markers were normal. A transthoracic echocardiogram showed mild dilatation of the aortic root (44 mm) and the aortic arch (37 mm), and a bicuspid aortic valve with a moderate stenosis and mild aortic regurgitation. A CT examination with intravenous injection of contrast was urgently performed. This study showed a 1 cm hypodense stripe suggestive of an aortic dissection on the posterior wall of the ascending aorta, immediately above the cardiac valvar plane (fig 1). Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) did not confirm the presence of an aortic dissection. Rather, it showed an anomalous course of a coronary artery between the aorta and right ventricular outflow tract (fig 2). Coronary angiography subsequently documented an anomalous right coronary artery arising from the left sinus of Valsalva. The ostium of the anomalous artery was separate from that of the left main artery (fig 3). No coronary stenoses were detected during coronary angiography.
The patient was discharged three days later in good clinical condition with the recommendation to return for corrective surgery.
Aortic dissection is a serious, life threatening condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of this disorder with CT are 94% and 87%, respectively.3 Moreover, the ascending aorta is the most difficult region for CT to detect a dissection accurately because of significant motion artefacts.
TOE has many discrete advantages in the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection, the most important of which is its documented accuracy, with a reported sensitivity and specificity of 99% and 98%, respectively.4 Visualisation of the ascending root is feasible in most patients who undergo TOE. TOE can accurately diagnose aortic dissections and can be a useful adjunct to CT, particularly when the ascending aorta is involved. The TOE of our patient assisted in deriving the correct diagnosis. TOE should therefore be considered for other patients who present with suspected aortic dissection, particularly if CT suggests pathology only in the aortic root, where erroneous readings on CT are most likely to occur.
Nowadays, TOE and CT are both imaging and screening methods recommended for detecting CAA.1 A detailed assessment of the coronary artery anatomy is an established part of the evaluation of structural heart defects, but it is being increasingly incorporated into the evaluation of chest pain and pre-athletic screens. In fact, CAA are usually compatible with normal myocardial development and postnatal function, even permitting normal athletic activity in most people. On the other hand, sudden death is frequently the only symptom of a coronary anomaly.1 According to the sudden death committee of the American Heart Association,5 CAA cause 19% of deaths in athletes. Moreover, Burke and colleagues6 reported that CAA are involved in about 12% of sports related sudden cardiac deaths compared with 1.2% of non-sports related deaths in 14–40 year old patients.
Anomalous origins of the left main coronary artery from the right aortic sinus of Valsalva and of the right coronary artery from the left sinus of Valsalva are the most common CAA associated with angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death.7 The incidence of morbidity and death is even higher when the coronary anomaly is associated with other anomalies such as a bicuspid aortic valve.8 In these cases, corrective surgery is recommended.
The pathophysiological mechanism most likely to explain chest pain and sudden death is that CAA are often associated with an anomalous course between the great vessels. Thus, the aorta and pulmonary artery impinge on the anomalous vessel, especially during exercise when there is aortic and pulmonary artery dilatation, and this is coincident with increased coronary flow demand.1 Our patient’s chest pain was likely a result of a similar sequence of events. Other imaging techniques have confirmed the presence of ischaemia in such patients. Recently, a perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance study9 documented a perfusion defect in a similar patient with CAA coursing between the aorta and pulmonary artery. We also previously observed reversible myocardial perfusion defects with stress/rest sestamibi 99-technetium single photon emission computed tomography in 10 patients with angiographically documented CAA10 with an anomalous course between the great vessels.
In conclusion, CAA should be taken into consideration in the clinical setting of chest pain and sudden death, even among young athletes. An integrated approach using CT and TOE should be desirable for differential diagnosis between aortic dissection and proximal course of CAA.