Article Text


Ethnic variations in acute coronary syndromes
  1. G A Lanza
  1. Correspondence to:
    Gaetano Antonio Lanza MD
    Istituto di Cardiologia, Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, L.go A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 – Roma, Italy;


Although it is very likely that ethnic variations in the incidence and, possibly, clinical outcome of acute coronary artery disease events exist, the causes for such differences are many and difficult to address fully, given the complex interplay of contributing factors

  • acute coronary syndromes
  • epidemiology
  • ethnic differences
  • sex differences
  • ACS, acute coronary syndromes
  • AMI, acute myocardial infarction
  • CAD, coronary artery disease
  • SMIR, Singapore Myocardial Infarction Register

Statistics from

Population registries and epidemiological surveys have shown relevant differences in the incidence of clinical events caused by atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) among different countries in the world. Overall, these studies highlighted that CAD event rates are higher in North Europe and North America, and lower in Mediterranean and Oriental populations (for example, Chinese and Japanese).1,2 The obvious issue raised by these observations is whether differences are merely connected to environmental, nutritional and lifestyle factors, or whether genetic factors play any relevant role.

The importance of acquired factors is well known. Risk factors for CAD have been clearly identified in economically developed western countries and they are almost absent in underdeveloped societies, where CAD event rates are low. Accordingly, in developing areas the acquisition of western lifestyles is associated with a significant increase in CAD events, a phenomenon also observed in people who have emigrated from underdeveloped towards industrialised countries.3 In contrast, whether and in which way genetic factors influence ethnic differences in CAD events has not adequately been investigated yet.

Multiracial societies, including people belonging to different ethnic groups, exposed to similar environmental factors, may provide the unique possibility to explore the role of genetic factors in CAD events. These studies, however, may be difficult to interpret as minority ethnic groups often maintain most of their own habits for several generations and, compared to the predominant population, usually have lower social, educational, and economic conditions, thus making it difficult to discriminate between acquired and possible genetic determinants of risk.


In this issue, Mak and colleagues4 report data on sex differences in coronary mortality following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) among the three major ethnic groups which form the population of the city-state of Singapore—that is, Chinese (61.8%), Indians (17.5%), and Malays (19.0%). Data are derived from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Register (SMIR), which enrolled all potential cases of AMI in 25–64 year old people living in Singapore from 1991 to 1999. This report is an extension of the recently published data about AMI incidence and mortality in this population.5

The first major finding emerging from the SMIR database is a higher incidence of AMI in Indians and in Malays compared to Chinese (age standardised odds ratio 3.1 and 2.1, respectively).5 While other data on Malays are lacking, the higher risk of AMI in Indians is consistent with that observed in other countries,6,7 and the lower risk in Chinese with that observed in previous epidemiological reports.1,2

These results may suggest that some genetic factors can make Indians predisposed to, and/or Chinese protected against, acute CAD events. Previous studies have indeed shown that Indians present a peculiar cardiovascular risk profile, characterised by a high prevalence of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, central obesity, and diabetes, together with increased blood concentrations of other CAD risk indicators, including the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, homocysteine, and lipoprotein(a).6 However, there is no definite evidence that this risk pattern is related to genetically determined ethnic factors and that it is directly responsible for the higher risk of CAD events in this ethnic group.

Acquired factors

Acquired factors have, in fact, been suggested to contribute significantly to the increased risk in Indians; these include a high consumption of clarified fat (ghee), resulting in dyslipidaemia, and a reduced probability to receive timely interventions for CAD prevention and care, due to a combination of cultural and socioeconomic factors, but also due to a frequent atypical CAD presentation, which may delay involvement of the healthcare system.6 Furthermore, a recent study failed to show an increased prevalence of factor V (Leiden) and thrombomodulin gene polymorphisms, potentially related to thrombogenesis, in Indians.8

Similar issues are found when assessing ethnic differences in CAD events in other geographic contexts. In the USA, the few studies comparing CAD events in black and white people provided complex and even contrasting results. Taken together, data seem to suggest that black people, compared to whites, may present similar or reduced risk but they also suggest that further ethnic differences might exist among specific age/sex subgroups.9,10

Age and sex differences

In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I epidemiologic follow up study,10 involving 11 406 subjects, the risk adjusted hazard of CAD events was lower in both black men and women, compared to white subjects (relative risk (RR) 0.69 and 0.87, respectively). Yet black young women (25–54 years old) showed a higher age adjusted risk for coronary death (RR 2.25), compared to white young women, although the difference became non-significant after correction for risk factors (RR 1.17, 95% confidence limits (CL) 0.58 to 2.37). On the other hand, the risk for CAD events was higher in post-menopausal black women, compared to white women, enrolled in the heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study (RR 2.05), although the difference was reduced after adjustment for confounding factors (RR 1.52, 95% CL 1.04 to 2.21).10

The reasons for this complex picture are not clear. Black people usually have higher rates of risk factors, including hypertension and diabetes, yet they usually show less severe CAD at angiography10 and even lower degrees of coronary calcification on computed tomography. Furthermore, black people have lower socioeconomic status and education, which have also been associated with increased risk. Thus, the similar or lower prevalence of CAD events in blacks may suggest either some genetic protective factors or maintenance of some unspecified healthier protective habits. The worse risk factor and social profile, combined with the low CAD incidence, however, might be penalising for black women, resulting in selection bias of the worst cases and delay in clinical CAD diagnosis and treatment.

Independent of the causes, ethnic variations in the incidence of CAD events may be associated, at least in some cases, with certain differences in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Thus, in a recent study Japanese patients with AMI were found to have a significantly higher frequency of inducible vasospasm, both in the infarct and non-infarct related artery (67% and 39%, respectively), compared to Italian patients (23% and 11%, respectively), suggesting that coronary spasm might be involved more frequently in causing ACS in Japanese than in western populations.12


A second intriguing issue raised by the SMIR database is the possibility that mortality associated with AMI also might differ among ethnic groups, not necessarily paralleling AMI incidence, and that the differences might mainly concern specific age/sex subgroups, rather than the ethnic groups as a whole. In Mak’s study,4 the 28 day fatality rates were indeed higher in Malays, compared to the two other ethnic groups. Sex analysis, however, revealed that whereas fatality rates differed significantly among women, with persistence of the differences at long term follow up, there were no significant differences among men.4

The higher mortality in Malay women does not seem to be explained by differences in clinical characteristics. Furthermore, the differences among groups were substantially related to pre-hospital fatality rates, thus excluding a major role for variations in acute hospital care or response to treatment (for example, thrombolysis, revascularisation procedures). Thus, although more extensive CAD and increased fatal arrhythmias cannot be excluded, it is possible that the higher death rates in the minority ethnic group of Malay women might again be due, at least in part, to a selection bias of most severe patients, or to a delay in diagnosis and recurrence to medical care.

The suggestion that AMI related mortality may differ among ethnic groups has previously received limited attention. Investigations in the USA have provided contrasting data, with studies showing lower, higher or no differences between black and non-black, patients13,14; these studies, however, are limited by the inclusion of in-hospital deaths only. Furthermore, differences between ethnic groups in baseline clinical characteristics, and sometimes also in acute management, may have influenced clinical outcome. Overall, whether a different ethnic susceptibility to death following ACS does exist is an intriguing but unsettled question.

Regardless of ethnic considerations, Mak’s data, on the other hand, lend support to the hypothesis of increased AMI related fatality rates in women, as compared to men.4 The higher mortality in women reported in previous studies was largely attributed to worse clinical features at presentation,2,15 and it has also been suggested that it might actually be apparent, concerning only in-hospital deaths, which would be counterbalanced by a higher pre-hospital mortality in men.15,16 In the SMIR registry, however, both pre- and in-hospital adjusted fatality rates were consistently higher in women in all ethnic groups. Thus, taken together, these and previous data2,15 may suggest that sex differences in AMI related mortality might actually exist, but in some populations only.


In summary, the SMIR database4,5 highlights that ethnic variations in the incidence and, possibly, clinical outcome of acute CAD events probably exist. The causes for such differences, however, are multiple and difficult to fully address, given the complex interplay of contributing factors.

Environmental, nutritional, socioeconomic, cultural, and lifestyle factors certainly play a major role. On the other hand, genetic factors might significantly contribute to ethnic differences variously influencing the susceptibility to risk factors, atherosclerosis, precipitating causes of ACS and, possibly, cardiac arrhythmias. Their actual role, however, remains to be established.

In the meantime, fighting against classical risk factors, which have consistently been associated with CAD events, and intervening timely and appropriately in patients with a suspicion of an ACS remain the major goals for decreasing CAD incidence and mortality in any kind of ethnic groups.


I thank Professor Filippo Crea for his critical review of the manuscript and his precious advice. I am also indebted to Dr Greogory A Sgueglia for his valuable assistance in preparing the manuscript.


View Abstract

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.