Article Text

PDF
Thiazolidinediones and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
  1. Sonal Singh1,
  2. Curt D Furberg2
  1. 1
    Section on General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  2. 2
    Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  1. Dr S Singh, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA; sosingh{at}wfubmc.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Patients with type 2 diabetes experience high rates of comorbid conditions such as hypertension and dyslipidaemia that further compound their already increased risk of developing ischaemic heart disease (IHD). IHD and hypertension, in turn, represent conditions that are major precursors of congestive heart failure (CHF), adding to the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden in this patient population. This is reflected in the reported estimate of IHD prevalence in diabetics (approximating 22%)1 and the reported 10-year incidence of CHF among elderly patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (exceeding 50%).2 The American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association have also noted in a joint scientific statement paper that CVD contributes to more than three-quarters of all deaths in diabetic patients.3

S Singh

The health benefits of treating hypertension with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors4 and treating hyperlipidaemia with statins5 have been well established in clinical trials. The use of other preventive measures such as aspirin and smoking cessation are also generally accepted. It remains unclear, however, to what extent glycaemic control with currently available oral agents reduces the macrovascular complications of diabetes. Although these more recently developed and approved agents, including the thiazolidinediones, are being heavily prescribed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, there is no documentation from clinical trials that they reduce the risk of IHD. Consequently, none has been granted regulatory approval for this indication.

C Furberg

GLYCAEMIC CONTROL AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK

Three recently published large, randomised clinical trials all failed to demonstrate that intensive glycaemic control reduces CVD mortality or morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. In ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes),6 participants in the intensive treatment arm (targeting a glycated haemoglobin level of <6.0%) experienced excess mortality compared with those receiving standard treatment (targeting a level from 7.0% to 7.9%) (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22; 95% CI 1.01 to …

View Full Text

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.