You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original article
Cardiac rehabilitation
Effect of cardiac rehabilitation on angiogenic cytokines in postinfarction patients
  1. B-C Lee1,2,
  2. H-C Hsu1,
  3. W-Y I Tseng3,4,
  4. M-Y M Su5,
  5. S-Y Chen6,
  6. Y-W Wu1,2,
  7. K-L Chien1,7,
  8. M-F Chen1
  1. 1
    Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  2. 2
    Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  3. 3
    Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  4. 4
    Center for Optoelectronic Biomedicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  5. 5
    Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
  6. 6
    Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
  7. 7
    Institute of Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
  1. Professor M-F Chen, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan; mfchen{at}ntu.edu.tw

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether cardiac rehabilitation influences plasma levels of angiogenic cytokines and their correlation with myocardial blood flow (MBF).

Design: Randomised controlled study.

Setting: Tertiary cardiac centre.

Patients: 39 postinfarction patients randomised to either a 3-month training group (n = 20) or a non-training group (n = 19), and 19 normal controls.

Interventions: Cardiac rehabilitation.

Main outcome measures: MBF by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and plasma levels of stem cell factor (SCF), stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) measured at enrolment and at 3 months after randomisation.

Results: At baseline, when compared with the healthy subjects, postinfarction patients had a lower MBF in the infarcted myocardium during dipyridamole-induced stress (1.65 (0.58) vs 2.77 (0.78) ml/min/g, p<0.001) but higher plasma levels of VEGF (3.65 (0.75) vs 2.77 (0.59) pg/ml, p<0.001 expressed as the natural logarithm) and SDF-1 (2113 (345) vs 1869 (309) pg/ml, p = 0.009). Only SDF-1 was inversely associated with stress MBF in both remote (r = −0.39, p = 0.03) and infarcted myocardium (r = −0.62, p<0.001). After 3 months, the training group’s stress MBF had increased by 33% in the remote (p<0.001) and 28% in infarcted myocardium (p = 0.02), while VEGF decreased by 9% (p = 0.01), and SDF-1 decreased by 11% (p = 0.02). The change in SDF-1 was inversely correlated with the change in stress MBF in both remote (r = −0.40, p = 0.01) and infarcted myocardium (r = −0.50, p = 0.001). In the non-training group, MBF and cytokines were unchanged.

Conclusion: Cardiac rehabilitation improves stress MBF in postinfarction patients, with an inverse decrease in circulating angiogenic cytokines.

https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2008.153510

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding: The study was supported by Grant 95-2745-B-002-005 from National Science Council, Taiwan.

    • Competing interests: None.

    • Ethics approval: Ethics approval was provided by the National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

    • Patient consent: Obtained.