rss
Heart 2009;95:1165-1171 doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.160465
  • Original article
  • Heart failure and cardiomyopathy

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy in paediatric and congenital heart disease: differential effects in various anatomical and functional substrates

This article has been UnlockedFree via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS
  1. J Janoušek1,
  2. R A Gebauer2,
  3. H Abdul-Khaliq3,
  4. M Turner4,
  5. L Kornyei5,
  6. O Grollmuß1,
  7. E Rosenthal6,
  8. E Villain7,
  9. A Früh8,
  10. T Paul9,
  11. N A Blom10,
  12. J-M Happonen11,
  13. U Bauersfeld12,
  14. J R Jacobsen13,
  15. F van den Heuvel14,
  16. T Delhaas15,
  17. J Papagiannis16,
  18. C Trigo17,
  19. for the Working Group for Cardiac Dysrhythmias and Electrophysiology of the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology
  1. 1
    Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Centre, Leipzig, Germany
  2. 2
    Kardiocentrum and Cardiovascular Research Centre, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
  3. 3
    German Heart Centre Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  4. 4
    Bristol Royal Infirmary and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
  5. 5
    Hungarian Paediatric Heart Centre, Budapest, Hungary
  6. 6
    Evelina Children’s Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Trust, London, UK
  7. 7
    Département de Cardiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
  8. 8
    Paediatric Cardiology Unit, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  9. 9
    Department of Paediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Göttingen, Germany
  10. 10
    Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
  11. 11
    Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  12. 12
    Division of Paediatric Cardiology, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  13. 13
    Department of Paediatrics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  14. 14
    Beatrix Children’s Hospital, Division of Paediatric Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, The Netherlands
  15. 15
    Division of Paediatric Cardiology, AZ Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  16. 16
    Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Centre, Athens, Greece
  17. 17
    Servico de Cardiologia Pediatrica, Hospital de Santa Marta, Lisboa, Portugal
  1. Professor J Janoušek, Department of Paediatric Cardiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Centre, Strümpellstrasse 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany; jan.janousek{at}medizin.uni-leipzig.de
  • Accepted 10 March 2009
  • Published Online First 22 March 2009

Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is increasingly used in children in a variety of anatomical and pathophysiological conditions, but published data are scarce.

Objective: To record current practice and results of CRT in paediatric and congenital heart disease.

Design: Retrospective multicentre European survey.

Setting: Paediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery centres.

Patients: One hundred and nine patients aged 0.24–73.8 (median 16.9) years with structural congenital heart disease (n = 87), congenital atrioventricular block (n = 12) and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10) with systemic left (n = 69), right (n = 36) or single (n = 4) ventricular dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony during sinus rhythm (n = 25) or associated with pacing (n = 84).

Interventions: CRT for a median period of 7.5 months (concurrent cardiac surgery in 16/109).

Main outcome measures: Functional improvement and echocardiographic change in systemic ventricular function.

Results: The z score of the systemic ventricular end-diastolic dimension decreased by median 1.1 (p<0.001). Ejection fraction (EF) or fractional area of change increased by a mean (SD) of 11.5 (14.3)% (p<0.001) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improved by median 1.0 grade (p<0.001). Non-response to CRT (18.5%) was multivariably predicted by the presence of primary dilated cardiomyopathy (p = 0.002) and poor NYHA class (p = 0.003). Presence of a systemic left ventricle was the strongest multivariable predictor of improvement in EF/fractional area of change (p<0.001). Results were independent of the number of patients treated in each contributing centre.

Conclusion: Heart failure associated with ventricular pacing is the largest indication for CRT in paediatric and congenital heart disease. CRT efficacy varies widely with the underlying anatomical and pathophysiological substrate.

Footnotes

  • Funding: Ministry of Health, Czech Republic (grant NR/9472-3 to RAG) and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic (research project No 64203 to RAG).

  • Competing interests: None.

This article has been Unlocked
Free via Creative Commons: OPEN ACCESS

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. hrt.2008.160465v1
    2. 95/14/1165 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education in Heart

Latest from Education in Heart

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.