Article Text

PDF
Acute coronary syndromes
Benefit of angiographic spontaneous reperfusion in STEMI: does it extend to diabetic patients?
  1. K R Bainey1,
  2. Y Fu1,
  3. C B Granger2,
  4. C W Hamm3,
  5. D R Holmes Jr4,
  6. W W O’Neill5,
  7. R Seabra-Gomes6,
  8. M E Pfisterer7,
  9. F Van de Werf8,
  10. P W Armstrong1
  1. 1
    University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  2. 2
    Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, USA
  3. 3
    Kerckhoff Heart Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany
  4. 4
    Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
  5. 5
    University of Miami, Miami, USA
  6. 6
    Instituto do Coracao, Lisbon, Portugal
  7. 7
    University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  8. 8
    University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  1. Professor P W Armstrong, Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, 251 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada; paul.armstrong{at}ualberta.ca

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous reperfusion (SR) in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improves clinical outcome, yet its incidence and impact among diabetic patients is unclear.

Objective: To carry out a systematic analysis of SR in the diabetic cohort of a large primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated population with STEMI.

Methods and results: 4944 patients (15.5% diabetic) undergoing primary PCI in the APEX AMI study were evaluated. SR defined as pre-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow occurred in 11.5% of patients; it was more common in non-diabetic (11.9%) than in diabetic patients (9.2%) (p = 0.028). Patients with SR versus no SR had improved post-PCI TIMI 3 flow: in non-diabetic patients (99.8% vs 90.3%, p<0.001) and in diabetic patients (98.6% vs 84.9%, p<0.001). Non-diabetic patients with SR showed a significant improvement in 90-day death/shock/congestive heart failure (CHF) compared with those without SR: 4.4% versus 8.9% (p = 0.001), respectively. The composite outcome in diabetic patients with versus without SR was 10.0% versus 14.9% (p = 0.270), respectively. When outcomes were examined according to tertiles of baseline blood glucose, both non-diabetic and diabetic patients with normoglycaemia showed higher SR rates (15.5%, 10.3%, 7.3% for non-diabetic patients, p<0.001; 17.4%, 7.2%, 9.1% for diabetic patients, p = 0.132), greater ST resolution (55.4%, 52.6%, 49.7% for non-diabetic patients, p = 0.030; 50%, 46.4%, 39.1% for diabetic patients, p = 0.179), and improved 90-day death/shock/CHF (5.2%, 8.3%, 14% for non-diabetic patients p<0.001; 8.7%, 4.2%, 15.8% for diabetic patients, p = 0.006).

Conclusions: These data indicate that SR is less common in diabetic patients with STEMI. Diabetic patients without SR have worse post-PCI epicardial patency, which contributes to adverse outcomes. Diabetic patients with normal baseline blood glucose and SR have enhanced epicardial flow after PCI and improved prognosis.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding: This study was jointly funded by Procter and Gamble, Pharmaceuticals and Alexion Pharmaceuticals.

  • Competing interests: Not declared.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.