rss
Heart 95:1380-1381 doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.164533
  • Editorial

Is it primarily tricuspid regurgitation, constriction or restriction?

  1. Lynne Williams,
  2. Michael Frenneaux
  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor M Frenneaux, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; M.P.Frenneaux{at}bham.ac.uk
  • Published Online First 17 May 2009

In patients presenting with signs and symptoms of right heart failure an accurate diagnosis of underlying aetiology is vital in order to aid referral for appropriate treatment. Severe tricuspid regurgitation, constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy may have similar clinical features and findings at cardiac catheterisation, including elevation and near equalisation of left and right ventricular diastolic pressures. A recent study has described criteria for distinguishing constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy,1 and in this issue of Heart, Jaber et al propose novel haemodynamic criteria for differentiating tricuspid regurgitation from constrictive pericarditis using cardiac catheterisation (see page 1449).2

The underlying aetiology of pericardial constriction has changed over recent decades. Whereas in the past many patients presented with severe and global calcification of the pericardium secondary to tuberculosis, patients are now more likely to develop pericardial constriction after mediastinal irradiation or cardiac surgery (often in conjunction with myocardial involvement).3 In these patients the calcification is often more localised and less pronounced, and pericardial thickness may even lie within the normal range. In these cases diagnosis on the basis of imaging studies alone may be far more challenging, as patients with surgically proven pericardial constriction may have a normal pericardial appearance on imaging.4 In addition, determining the relative contribution of pericardial restraint and myocardial dysfunction poses a diagnostic challenge. Severe tricuspid regurgitation is seen more often owing to both the increasing number of patients with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood and an increase in implantation rates of both cardiac resynchronisation therapy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Lin et al have previously described a series of 41 patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation due to permanent pacemaker or defibrillator leads.5 In these patients echocardiographic imaging is inherently difficult owing to acoustic dropout from the pacing leads, and in this …

Latest from Education in Heart

Latest from Education in Heart

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.