rss
Heart 2009;95:1913-1919 doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.172072
  • Original article
  • Interventional cardiology

Optical coherence tomography assessment of the acute effects of stent implantation on the vessel wall: a systematic quantitative approach

  1. N Gonzalo,
  2. P W Serruys,
  3. T Okamura,
  4. Z J Shen,
  5. Y Onuma,
  6. H M Garcia-Garcia,
  7. G Sarno,
  8. C Schultz,
  9. R J van Geuns,
  10. J Ligthart,
  11. E Regar
  1. Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr E Regar, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Bd 585, ‘s-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015-CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands; e.regar{at}erasmusmc.nl
  • Accepted 28 July 2009
  • Published Online First 10 August 2009

Abstract

Objective: To observe and characterise vessel injury after stenting using optical coherence tomography (OCT), to propose a systematic OCT classification for periprocedural vessel trauma, to evaluate its frequency in stable versus unstable patients and to assess its clinical impact during the hospitalisation period.

Setting: Stenting causes vessel injury.

Design and interventions: All consecutive patients in whom OCT was performed after stent implantation were included in the study. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of tissue prolapse, intra-stent dissection and edge dissection were performed.

Results: Seventy-three patients (80 vessels) were analysed. Tissue prolapse within the stented segment was visible in 78/80 vessels (97.5%). Median number of tissue prolapse sites was 8 (IQR 4–19), mean (SD) area 1.04 (0.9) mm2. Intra-stent dissection flaps were visible in 69/80 vessels (86.3%) (median number 3 (IQR 1.25–6), maximum flap length 450 (220) μm). Fifty-five out of 80 vessels (68.8%) showed dissection cavities (median number 2 (IQR 0–4.75), maximum depth 340 (170) μm). Edge dissection was visible in 20 vessels (mean (SD) length flap 744 (439) μm). The frequency of tissue prolapse or intra-stent dissection was similar in stable and unstable patients (95.6% vs 100%, p = 0.5 for tissue prolapse; 91.1% vs 82.9%, p = 0.3 for intra-stent dissection). There were no events during the hospitalisation period.

Conclusions: OCT allows a detailed visualisation of vessel injury after stent implantation and enables a systematic classification and quantification in vivo. In this study, frequency of tissue prolapse or intra-stent dissections after stenting was high, irrespective of the clinical presentation of the patients, and was not associated with clinical events during hospitalisation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • See Editorial, p 1895

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Relevant Article

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. hrt.2009.172072v1
    2. 95/23/1913 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education in Heart

Latest from Education in Heart

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.