rss
Heart 2009;95:740-746 doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.154856
  • Original article
  • Epidemiology

Coronary heart disease epidemics: not all the same

  1. M Mirzaei1,
  2. A S Truswell2,
  3. R Taylor3,
  4. S R Leeder1
  1. 1
    Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Victor Coppleson Bldg, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2
    Human Nutrition Unit, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3
    School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  1. Dr Masoud Mirzaei, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Victor Coppleson Bldg (D02), the University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2006 Australia; mirzaeim{at}med.usyd.edu.au
  • Accepted 24 November 2008
  • Published Online First 18 December 2008

Abstract

Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) was an important epidemic in many developed countries in the 20th century and there is concern because the epidemic has affected Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia and is starting to affect developing countries.

Methods: The epidemic curves of CHD mortality for 55 countries, which had reliable data and met other selection criteria, were examined using age-standardised death rates 35–74 years from the World Health Organization. Annual male mortality rates for individual countries from 1950 to 2003 were plotted and a table and a graph used to classify countries by magnitude, pattern and timing of its CHD epidemic.

Results: The natural history of CHD epidemics varies markedly among countries. Different CHD patterns are distinguishable including “rise and fall” (classic epidemic pattern), “rising” (first part of epidemic) and “flat” (no epidemic yet). Furthermore, epidemic peaks were higher in Anglo-Celtic countries first affected by the epidemic, and subsequent peaks were less, except for the recent extraordinary epidemics in Russia and Central Asian republics. There were considerable differences among some continental or regional geographical areas. Eastern European, South American and Asian countries have quite different epidemic characteristics, including shorter epidemic cycles.

Conclusions: It cannot be assumed that WHO regions or any other geographical regions will be useful when analysing CHD epidemics or deciding upon strategic policies to reduce CHD in individual countries. The needs for action that are urgent in some countries are less so in others, and even regional country groups can have quite different epidemic characteristics.

Footnotes

  • Funding: MM was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant (no 402793), on which he was a postdoctoral research fellow.

  • Competing interests: None.

Responses to this article

This Article

  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. hrt.2008.154856v1
    2. 95/9/740 most recent

Services

  1. Request permissions

Social bookmarking

Latest from Education in Heart

Latest from Education in Heart

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of Heart.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for Heart. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.