Article Text

PDF
Heart rate deceleration after exercise predicts patients most likely to respond to cardiac resynchronisation therapy
  1. D E Thomas,
  2. S A Exton,
  3. Z R Yousef
  1. University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dewi E Thomas, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4xn, UK; drdethomas{at}yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

Objective This study examines the relationship between heart rate recovery following exercise and subsequent response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).

Background Blunted heart rate recovery is an adverse prognostic marker in heart failure and has been shown to correlate with disease severity.

Methods 37 patients receiving biventricular pacemakers for conventional indications underwent functional assessments; cardiopulmonary exercise test, 6-min walk test and quality-of-life assessment, together with echo analyses, before and at 3 months following implant. Heart rate deceleration (HRD) gradients were calculated at 30-, 60-, 90- and 120-s intervals following cessation of the baseline exercise test and compared with subsequent markers of response to CRT. Functional response was defined as ≥20% improvement in any two of the three functional assessments, and echo response defined as ≥5% increase in ejection fraction.

Results Functional responders demonstrated steeper HRD gradients than non-responders at 30, 60 and 90 s. Echo responders also demonstrated steeper HRD at 30 and 60 s from the cessation of exercise. Receiver-operating curve analysis demonstrates area under the curve of 0.87 and 0.82, respectively, for HRD30 to predict functional and echo response to CRT. A cut-off value of 3 for HRD30, equating to a 5% reduction in HR between peak exercise and 30 s into recovery, demonstrates the optimal sensitivity/specificity profile to perform this function.

Conclusions HRD following exercise correlates with functional and echocardiographic response to CRT. Application of this parameter in addition to standard criteria may provide valuable supplementary information in the evaluation of prospective CRT candidates.

  • Pacemakers
  • exercise testing
  • Accepted 18 February 2010

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.