Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction has been reported along with myocardial viral infection. Whether intramural coronary vessels infection plays a role in patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX) is unknown.
Methods Thirteen consecutive patients (four men, nine women, mean age 51±10.5 years) with drug-resistant CSX underwent left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy. Myocardial tissue was examined for histology, immunohistochemistry and for the presence of cardiotropic viruses by PCR analysis. In the presence of a viral infection on the whole tissue, laser microdissection was performed to analyse the viral genome selectively in intramural vessels and cardiomyocytes. Controls were surgical cardiac biopsies from patients with chronic stable angina and from patients with mitral stenosis and normal cardiac function (normal controls).
Results Histology showed hypertrophy and degeneration of cardiomyocytes with interstitial and replacement fibrosis in all CSX, while focal lymphocytic myocarditis was additionally recognised in three patients. No vasculitis was observed. Viral genomes were detected in nine of 13 CSX (Epstein–Barr virus in four, adenovirus in three, human herpes virus (HHV) 6 in one, Epstein–Barr adenovirus co-infection in one). Laser microdissection showed that Epstein–Barr and adenovirus localised both in cardiomyocytes and intramural vessels, while HHV-6 infection was confined to the vessel wall.
Conclusions Viral genomes can be detected in intramural vessels of up to 69% of drug-resistant CSX. Coronary small vessels infection represents an alternative pathophysiological mechanism of this syndrome and can explain the poor response to anti-ischaemic drugs.
- Coronary microcirculation
- endomyocardial biopsy
- laser microdissection
- syndrome X
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked articles 206870.
Funding This study was funded by grant EX ART.56 entitled ‘HIV-related and unrelated inflammatory cardiomyopathy: identification of causal agents and pathogenetic mechanisms providing a tailored therapy’.
Competing interests None.
Patient consent Obtained.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of La Sapienza University.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.