Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials

Federico Piscione; Raffaele Piccolo; Salvatore Cassese; Gennaro Galasso; Claudia D'Andrea; Roberta De Rosa; Massimo Chiariello

doi:10.1136/hrt.2009.183277

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via BCS

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Browse by collection

Authors

About

Podcasts
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via BCS

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Systematic review

Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Piscione F, Piccolo R, Cassese S, et al

Is direct stenting superior to stenting with predilation in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention? results from a meta-analysis of 24 randomised controlled trials

Heart 2010;96:588-594.

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password